• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oceanic Disaster: The death of the Reefs

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
:(

In 2016 and 2017, marine heat waves caused by climate change resulted in mass bleaching, which killed about half of the corals on the Great Barrier Reef, along with many others around the world.

"Somewhere between a quarter and a third of all marine species everywhere has some part of their life cycle in coral reefs," he says. "So, you take out coral reefs and a third to a quarter of all species gets wiped out. Now that is ecological chaos, it is ecological collapse."



"I was a climate change skeptic, at first," he says. He realized that climate change was "serious" in the mid-1980s, and around 1990 he became "alarmed" about its impact on coral reefs.

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/08/world/great-barrier-reef/
Yep. I had my doubts too back then. But, like the scientist, denial became impossible position to hold once the numbers came in.

Does the math; figure I have 25 years left. Damn! I doubt I get out of here before SHTF.
 
:(


Yep. I had my doubts too back then. But, like the scientist, denial became impossible position to hold once the numbers came in.

Does the math; figure I have 25 years left. Damn! I doubt I get out of here before SHTF.

I was assured long ago that the ocean are going to die soon, that is why I told my kids to eat their fill of seafood early.
 
:(


Yep. I had my doubts too back then. But, like the scientist, denial became impossible position to hold once the numbers came in.

Does the math; figure I have 25 years left. Damn! I doubt I get out of here before SHTF.

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Remember when they told us coral bleaching was a sure result of recent man-made global warming? Never mind.[/h][FONT=&quot]From the “science eventually self-corrects” department, new science showing coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef is a centuries-old problem, well before “climate change” became a buzzword and rising CO2 levels were blamed. Marc Hendrickx writes: New paper shows coral bleaching in GBR extending back 400+ years. [This] busts myths promulgated by alarmist Dr. Ove…
[/FONT]

1 week ago August 17, 2018 in coral reefs.
 
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/17/remember-when-they-told-us-coral-bleaching-was-a-sure-result-of-recent-man-made-global-warming-never-mind/"]
bleached-coral1-220x126.jpg
[/URL][/FONT]

[h=1]Remember when they told us coral bleaching was a sure result of recent man-made global warming? Never mind.[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]From the “science eventually self-corrects” department, new science showing coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef is a centuries-old problem, well before “climate change” became a buzzword and rising CO2 levels were blamed. Marc Hendrickx writes: New paper shows coral bleaching in GBR extending back 400+ years. [This] busts myths promulgated by alarmist Dr. Ove…[/FONT]
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/17/remember-when-they-told-us-coral-bleaching-was-a-sure-result-of-recent-man-made-global-warming-never-mind/"]1 week ago August 17, 2018[/URL] in coral reefs.


:lamo
 

[FONT=&quot]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00283/full[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Reconstructing Four Centuries of Temperature-Induced Coral Bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Abstract:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Mass coral bleaching events during the last 20 years have caused major concern over the future of coral reefs worldwide. Despite damage to key ecosystem engineers, little is known about bleaching frequency prior to 1979 when regular modern systematic scientific observations began on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). To understand the longer-term relevance of current bleaching trajectories, the likelihood of future coral acclimatization and adaptation, and thus persistence of corals, records, and drivers of natural pre-industrial bleaching frequency and prevalence are needed. Here, we use linear extensions from 44 overlapping GBR coral cores to extend the observational bleaching record by reconstructing temperature-induced bleaching patterns over 381 years spanning 1620–2001. Porites spp. corals exhibited variable bleaching patterns with bleaching frequency (number of bleaching years per decade) increasing (1620–1753), decreasing (1754–1820), and increasing (1821–2001) again. Bleaching prevalence (the proportion of cores exhibiting bleaching) fell (1670–1774) before increasing by 10% since the late 1790s concurrent with positive temperature anomalies, placing recently observed increases in GBR coral bleaching into a wider context. Spatial inconsistency along with historically diverging patterns of bleaching frequency and prevalence provide queries over the capacity for holobiont (the coral host, the symbiotic microalgae and associated microorganisms) acclimatization and adaptation via bleaching, but reconstructed increases in bleaching frequency and prevalence, may suggest coral populations are reaching an upper bleaching threshold, a “tipping point” beyond which coral survival is uncertain.[/FONT]
 
[FONT="][URL]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00283/full[/URL][/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#404040][FONT="]Reconstructing Four Centuries of Temperature-Induced Coral Bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef[/FONT]

[FONT="]Abstract:[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#404040][FONT="]Mass coral bleaching events during the last 20 years have caused major concern over the future of coral reefs worldwide. Despite damage to key ecosystem engineers, little is known about bleaching frequency prior to 1979 when regular modern systematic scientific observations began on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). To understand the longer-term relevance of current bleaching trajectories, the likelihood of future coral acclimatization and adaptation, and thus persistence of corals, records, and drivers of natural pre-industrial bleaching frequency and prevalence are needed. Here, we use linear extensions from 44 overlapping GBR coral cores to extend the observational bleaching record by reconstructing temperature-induced bleaching patterns over 381 years spanning 1620–2001. Porites spp. corals exhibited variable bleaching patterns with bleaching frequency (number of bleaching years per decade) increasing (1620–1753), decreasing (1754–1820), and increasing (1821–2001) again. Bleaching prevalence (the proportion of cores exhibiting bleaching) fell (1670–1774) before increasing by 10% since the late 1790s concurrent with positive temperature anomalies, placing recently observed increases in GBR coral bleaching into a wider context. Spatial inconsistency along with historically diverging patterns of bleaching frequency and prevalence provide queries over the capacity for holobiont (the coral host, the symbiotic microalgae and associated microorganisms) acclimatization and adaptation via bleaching, but reconstructed increases in bleaching frequency and prevalence, may suggest coral populations are reaching an upper bleaching threshold, a “tipping point” beyond which coral survival is uncertain.[/FONT]

Good luck waiting for the recovery as the temperatures increase---oh wait! Your the guy who thinks the world is cooling.

So, in your mind, the CR will recover in a decade. :lamo
 
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/17/remember-when-they-told-us-coral-bleaching-was-a-sure-result-of-recent-man-made-global-warming-never-mind/"]
bleached-coral1-220x126.jpg
[/URL][/FONT]

[h=1]Remember when they told us coral bleaching was a sure result of recent man-made global warming? Never mind.[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]From the “science eventually self-corrects” department, new science showing coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef is a centuries-old problem, well before “climate change” became a buzzword and rising CO2 levels were blamed. Marc Hendrickx writes: New paper shows coral bleaching in GBR extending back 400+ years. [This] busts myths promulgated by alarmist Dr. Ove…[/FONT]
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/17/remember-when-they-told-us-coral-bleaching-was-a-sure-result-of-recent-man-made-global-warming-never-mind/"]1 week ago August 17, 2018[/URL] in coral reefs.


Ya...Notice if you will how humongously wrong the so-called experts turn out to be, often after many decades of claiming that they where sure and the abusing anyone who dared to speak up against them.

This actually matters.
 
Poisoning our oceans (with poisons) is the greatest REAL environmental issue today - that no one talks about OTHER than climate change. The climate change issue has killed almost all other environmental discussions.

Nearly all chemicals used ultimate will run off to the oceans. To deal with rising mercury and nickel levels in the oceans, they only thing done is to change what is considered a safe level for human consumption. Pesticides and all other chemicals end up in the ocean and basically stay their forever.

The problem is not climate change. It is poisons.

Kill the oceans and we kill ourselves. The oceans are the top source of oxygen and critical to the overall food chain.
 
Poisoning our oceans (with poisons) is the greatest REAL environmental issue today - that no one talks about OTHER than climate change. The climate change issue has killed almost all other environmental discussions.

Nearly all chemicals used ultimate will run off to the oceans. To deal with rising mercury and nickel levels in the oceans, they only thing done is to change what is considered a safe level for human consumption. Pesticides and all other chemicals end up in the ocean and basically stay their forever.

The problem is not climate change. It is poisons.

Kill the oceans and we kill ourselves. The oceans are the top source of oxygen and critical to the overall food chain.

Yes.

The AGW drivel psudo-science religion is simply the most harmful meam ever.
 
Yes.

The AGW drivel psudo-science religion is simply the most harmful meam ever.

Even more harmful are the blathering idiots who think mankind's actions can have no effect on the environment or climate, despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary. They have a political agenda they put above the facts and science.
 
Even more harmful are the blathering idiots who think mankind's actions can have no effect on the environment or climate, despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary. They have a political agenda they put above the facts and science.

Human activity has an effect.

How big is up for debate.

Is that harmful is not as there is an almost total lack of any significant bad stuff predicted.

The rest of the needed environmental progress in terms of toxin control and general looking after the world has been put aside whilst the none probelm holds all your attention.
 
:(


Yep. I had my doubts too back then. But, like the scientist, denial became impossible position to hold once the numbers came in.

Does the math; figure I have 25 years left. Damn! I doubt I get out of here before SHTF.

Lol@“once the numbers came in”. Those “numbers” were falsified in order to gain continuing funding.
 
Lol@“once the numbers came in”. Those “numbers” were falsified in order to gain continuing funding.

Ironic screen name since your position is "leave nothing for the kids."
 
Good luck waiting for the recovery as the temperatures increase---oh wait! Your the guy who thinks the world is cooling.

So, in your mind, the CR will recover in a decade. :lamo

We shall see, won't we.
 
We shall see, won't we.

What I expect to see is goal posts being moved by a bunch of climate deniers' legs running across the field.
 
Ironic screen name since your position is "leave nothing for the kids."

Don't be so melodramatic....you alarmists have been at it since the 70's...algore promised that nyc and Miami would be under water 10 years ago and that we'd be seeing category 6 hurricanes...you alarmists have been wrong every time. So far, the only climatologist that has been accurate is Joe Bastardi.


Your ilk tend to ignore history and science and buy into the hyperbole of those who greatly enrich themselves by spreading lies.
 
Poisoning our oceans (with poisons) is the greatest REAL environmental issue today - that no one talks about OTHER than climate change. The climate change issue has killed almost all other environmental discussions.

Nearly all chemicals used ultimate will run off to the oceans. To deal with rising mercury and nickel levels in the oceans, they only thing done is to change what is considered a safe level for human consumption. Pesticides and all other chemicals end up in the ocean and basically stay their forever.

The problem is not climate change. It is poisons.

Kill the oceans and we kill ourselves. The oceans are the top source of oxygen and critical to the overall food chain.

Climate change causes coral bleaching which is the most catastrophic threat to coral reefs around the world.
 
Last edited:
Climate change causes coral bleaching which is the most catastrophic threat to coral reefs around the world.

It has happened many times before.

New paper shows coral bleaching in Great Barrier Reef extending back 400+ years [link]
 
Just another silly alarmist thread, believing a news source that chooses words for impact and spin.
 
It has happened many times before.

New paper shows coral bleaching in Great Barrier Reef extending back 400+ years [link]

There have been five extinctions on Earth as well, that doesn't make it prudent for man to cause the sixth.
 
Just another silly alarmist thread, believing a news source that chooses words for impact and spin.

Did you read what the "Godfather of coral" said?
 
Back
Top Bottom