Odd that you would attach the word "settled" to a sensitivity that is in no scientific way, "settled"!
SO your own words are limited.
Clearly if you think the science is settled, you can describe which portion of it you think is settled.
Words which have limited meaning without data to support them.
Everything, in AGW is a factor of ECS, and the Summary for Policy makers should reflect this, and the uncertainties.
Population control does seem to be an undercurrent in most of the solutions proposed.A new angle on the non-scientific roots of AGW alarmism.
[FONT=&]". . . Whether its goal was curbing anthropogenic global cooling or global warming, the pessimist narrative’s endgame was always to institute top-down expert controls over population and centrally limit the human impetus to grow, create and aspire to change. In effect, the pessimist goal was to combat and control the optimist narrative through fear and discrediting its foundational impulses."[/FONT]
[FONT=&]
Was climate change alarmism always about fears of overpopulation?
[FONT=&]by Pierre Desrochers and Joanna Szurmak [Note: The following text is adapted from the authors’ recently published book Population Bombed! Exploding the Link Between Overpopulation and Climate Change in which the validity of the belief in the inherent unsustainability of economic growth is challenged more thoroughly.] Numerous population control advocates have linked anthropogenic climate change…
[/FONT]
