- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 47,695
- Reaction score
- 10,467
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Here's the text of the ruling:
https://www.eenews.net/assets/2018/06/26/document_cw_02.pdf
The analysis begins:
"The issue is not over science. All parties agree that fossil fuels have led to global warming and ocean rise and will continue to do so, and that eventually the navigable waters of the United States will intrude upon Oakland and San Francisco. The issue is a legal one — whether these producers of fossil fuels should pay for anticipated harm that will eventually flow from a rise in sea level."
And yet we know with pretty good certainty that the globe is about as warm as it was 5000 years ago and about a degree cooler than it was 8000 years ago.
Go figure. Everyone in the law suit on both sides is ill informed.