• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A major climate boundary in the central U.S. has shifted 140 miles due to global warming

Surface Detail said:
Here's what Dr. Roy Spencer has to say about so-called theory of evolution:

"I finally became convinced that the theory of creation actually had a much better scientific basis than the theory of evolution, for the creation model was actually better able to explain the physical and biological complexity in the world."

The Evolution Crisis

The guy's a religious loon.
Click to expand...

Stupidly irrelevant.
 
But the lefties love using bigotry. It makes them feel superior.
 
Jack Hays said:
I don't try to make my points via religious bigotry.
Click to expand...

It's got nothing to do with bigotry. Spencer's rejection of the science of evolution (a field in which he has no qualifications) indicates that he is prone to irrational thinking, which means that you'd have to be a fool to take what he says on trust.
 
Surface Detail said:
It's got nothing to do with bigotry. Spencer's rejection of the science of evolution (a field in which he has no qualifications) indicates that he is prone to irrational thinking, which means that you'd have to be a fool to take what he says on trust.
Click to expand...

It's bigotry. There are lots of scientists around the world who hold religious views you would dismiss as irrational. Your view virtually defines bigotry.
 
Surface Detail said:
It's got nothing to do with bigotry. Spencer's rejection of the science of evolution (a field in which he has no qualifications) indicates that he is prone to irrational thinking, which means that you'd have to be a fool to take what he says on trust.
Click to expand...

Except he signed on to the Cornwall Alliance, too...which states(I swear) that Jesus won’t allow climate change.
 
Surface Detail said:
First it's "what Dr. Roy Spencer has to say", now he's just the messenger. Who's messenger? God's?
Click to expand...

It is YOUR Deflection from the link Steve posted, that indicate that you have no argument against it.

Attacking the messenger is a old boring tactic.
 
Surface Detail said:
It's got nothing to do with bigotry. Spencer's rejection of the science of evolution (a field in which he has no qualifications) indicates that he is prone to irrational thinking, which means that you'd have to be a fool to take what he says on trust.
Click to expand...

Still not a word from you on the link, Steve Case posted. Maybe because it is a rational presentation. How else would you spend time trying to deflect from it?

You have nothing but evasion now, while his link goes unanswered.

By the way, Nicholas Copernicus, Issac Newton, and Tycho Brae are then loons by YOUR definition, because they were very religious, believed in Astrology and transmuting material into gold.

You are a funny guy!
 
longview said:
It is a bit of a misunderstanding, the Great Plains used to be called Great American Desert,
by settlers moving west in the mid 1800's, and was not considered suitable for Human habitation.
Bad farming practices, only harmed marginal land further.
In response to the dust bowl, millions of ponds and tree rows were planted, and new farming techniques,
were introduced in the 1930's. Trees and ponds have finite lifetimes.
The area is reverting back to land settlers in the mid 1800's would not consider stopping at.
Click to expand...

Seems a shame not to replant those trees and sort out the ponds.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Seems a shame not to replant those trees and sort out the ponds.
Click to expand...
Those things got done because we had a vast army of workers known as the CCC, which was a jobs program during the depression.
Most of the tree rows are still there, albeit a new generation of trees, but the ponds are mostly gone.
 
Originally Posted by Steve Case View Post
I'm not wrong about what NOAA says about the precipitation in those six states.
Click to expand...

Threegoofs said:
Congratulations.

It’s also not relevant to the point.
Click to expand...

Eh??????

It shows that the rainfall has increased. That the "boundary" has moved westwards.

That seems to be very relevant.

Just because you don't like it does not mean that the winning information posted by Steve is out of bounds.
 
Last edited:
longview said:
Those things got done because we had a vast army of workers known as the CCC, which was a jobs program during the depression.
Most of the tree rows are still there, albeit a new generation of trees, but the ponds are mostly gone.
Click to expand...

Call them the Climate Change Corps and redo it.
 
[FONT=&quot]Desertification[/FONT]
[h=1]Pushing the Great American Desert Eastward – Reality or Hype?[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest essay by Rick Yarnell In 1877 an explorer and scientist named John Wesley Powell conceived a dividing line in the North American continent that marked the separation of the green and humid East from the dry, desert West. That dividing line was the 100th Meridian. East of this line, conventional agriculture, which he asserted…
[/FONT]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom