• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2017 was the 2nd Warmest Year on Record

Lord of Planar said:
NASA and the EPA would be most likely to. President Trump could change the l4adership of them, and have them research the opposing ideas for a bit, and demand an honest opinion based on the missing pieces of the science. I am confident, farther research for the solar effects on the oceans, soot on ice, and evapotransiration changes due to all forms of land use changes, will force the numbers for greenhouse gasses down.

Aerosols are the largest factor that we can productively reduce, maybe even eliminate at a reasonable cost. These cause havoc in the north.
Click to expand...

President Trump has appointed a AGW denier to NASA. I bet in a year AGW will still be the official position of NASA
 
Jack Hays said:
The Climate Resistance was born and grew in the blogs. It was a stupid decision to ignore and denigrate them. The time is coming, soon, when the Resistance will overthrow AGW tyranny.
Click to expand...

He didn't even read the links since ALL the data under discussion was from Shakun's paper. But Shakun OMITTED the additional CO2 data that destroyed his paper in order to make his false conclusion, it is why he has no credibility.
 
Buzz writes,

If you want to know what the trend is "per decade" then you either need to use ten years or do a bit more math. Your ".025 per decade" is actually only 9 years. I used 10 years so that the trend line would automatically be the decadal trend for the last 10 years.
Click to expand...

A fair point, however since Dr. Jones already covered the time frame from 1975-2009, therefore I simply went from 2009 onwards, which I have repeated TWO times now at post 218 and post 232 which I reproduce again below:

You should read my post again, there is a reason why I started at 2009 which should be obvious.

But since the obvious eludes you, here it is:

DR. Jones stated this:

"1975-2009 warming rate is .161C per decade"

Then I did the obvious by starting from 2009 to now using the same data source he used when he was the DIRECTOR of CRU. It is indeed about .025 per decade.

Then I posted this that you completely bypassed, "1975- warming rate is about .15C per decade"

You moved the starting point to a year neither me or Dr. Jones used, which is a typical example of your dishonesty. GISS is the worst data set and one Dr. Jones didn't use.

I have honestly used the SAME data set Dr. Jones used and followed HIS data points properly, you didn't.
Click to expand...

This is why I went from 2009 onwards.

Notice that you STILL completely ignore the 1975 to 2018 trend.

You are the one who changed the starting points, which no longer match with what Dr. Jones presented, and what I have followed thus you made a misleading/dishonest statement.

Your trend line argument has NOTHING to do with what DR. Jones or I said at all.
 
Jack Hays said:
There is no conspiracy, and the organizations may be among the last to abandon AGW. Copernicus worked alone.
Click to expand...

There is no conspiracy, because these groups speak the truth. Something, you and your oil-industry employers know nothing about
 
Lord of Planar said:
NASA and the EPA would be most likely to. President Trump could change the l4adership of them, and have them research the opposing ideas for a bit, and demand an honest opinion based on the missing pieces of the science. I am confident, farther research for the solar effects on the oceans, soot on ice, and evapotransiration changes due to all forms of land use changes, will force the numbers for greenhouse gasses down.

Aerosols are the largest factor that we can productively reduce, maybe even eliminate at a reasonable cost. These cause havoc in the north.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Trump is going to also convince the Royal Academy:roll:

Funny, how you rely on the biggest, most immoral idiot on the planet to find your truth.
 
[h=1]Lewandowsky Compares Watts to Hitler[/h]Posted on 22 Apr 18 by GEOFF CHAMBERS • 19 Comments
A great man once said: “The definition of sanity is doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result until you get carted away in a straitjacket. Then you win.” Which is why I’m coming back to the subject of Professor Lewandowsky, who is on record as stating that his research has … Continue read
 
Media_Truth said:
Yeah, Trump is going to also convince the Royal Academy:roll:

Funny, how you rely on the biggest, most immoral idiot on the planet to find your truth.
Click to expand...

I didn't say that.
 
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/

The NOAA can be consulted for a report of the worldwide climate for the 1st quarter of 2018. So far, 2018 is the 6th warmest first quarter on record.
World_Temp_1stQ_2018.jpg

Temperatures in the US were lower than normal in the Midwest and East coast. The Western US was very warm in January, and a little cooler in Feb and March.
 
Agriculture
[h=1]Likely coldest April since 1895 – U.S. farmers delay planting crops[/h]Farmers are suffering as the cold, wet spring has put a stunning halt to agriculture. Ice Age Farmer Report – 19 Apr 2018 Soil temperatures are below normal, and not conducive to planting yet. “Temperatures going down, greenhouses going up. Crop losses continue globally, and we must all be preparing for the times ahead.” Ice Age…
 
Jack Hays said:

[h=1]Some Major U.S. cities headed for coldest April in recorded history[/h]Some major U.S. are on track to be part of a record cold April. “Some cities in the east are experiencing temperatures a full 10 to 15 degrees F colder than normal, says meteorologist Jaclyn Whittal. Those cities include Buffalo, Chicago and Detroit. Those in the northern tier of the U.S. either graciously accept winter…
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

As my post showed earlier, global temperatures are still very high. Typical that Watts, the High Schooler, wouldn't understand that.
 
Jack Hays said:
story and video:
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/us/news/articles/cold-great-lakes-upper-midwest-detroit-michigan-chicago-buffalo-new-york-wisconsin-april-record-temperature-/1
Click to expand...

Your global view is lacking seriously.

https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/ecology/2016/03/warmest-winter-russian-history

The two lasts winters have been record warm in Russia. Last winter saw many heat records, but this winter have broken them all and is taking its place as the warmest in the history of Russian weather observations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom