• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Tottering AGW Paradigm [W:31]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Law enforcement climate schemers get exposed by TV ads[/h][FONT=&quot]“LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR RENT”: GAO RELEASES 5 TV ADS RE: MERCENARY BLOOMBERG/AGs CLIMATE SCHEME (Washington, DC) Climate Litigation Watch, a project of the public interest law firm Government Accountability & Oversight, P.C., has released new television ads running in five states, informing Marylanders, New Mexicans, Oregonians, Pennsylvanians and Virginians of recently unearthed details of their…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/31/law-enforcement-climate-schemers-get-exposed-by-tv-ads/"]
AG-tv-ad-460x260.jpg
[/URL][/FONT]

[h=1]Law enforcement climate schemers get exposed by TV ads[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]“LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR RENT”: GAO RELEASES 5 TV ADS RE: MERCENARY BLOOMBERG/AGs CLIMATE SCHEME (Washington, DC) Climate Litigation Watch, a project of the public interest law firm Government Accountability & Oversight, P.C., has released new television ads running in five states, informing Marylanders, New Mexicans, Oregonians, Pennsylvanians and Virginians of recently unearthed details of their…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/31/law-enforcement-climate-schemers-get-exposed-by-tv-ads/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]

Utterly unbelievable.
 
[FONT=&quot]Global warming[/FONT]
[h=1]Scientific Apophenia[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest Essay by Kip Hansen Science, as a whole, advances or fails to advance in large part in a direct relationship to the presence or absence of bias in its research efforts. There are many types of bias, and these have been discussed in the pages of various Climate Science blogs and publications over…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Hothouse claims from ‘Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene’ are in a virtual world, not the real world[/h][FONT=&quot]From the “Tales of the Adjustocene” department. Guest essay by Albert Parker A recent paper Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene (Ref. [1] below) claims that even if the CO2 emission reductions called for in the Paris Agreement are met, our Earth may still enter what they call “Hothouse Earth” conditions, a long-term stabilization…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
As we approach the first anniversary of the publication of the seminal Svensmark et al 2017, it occurs to me that the next step for Svensmark and Shaviv could very well be a grand synthesis, a sort of Summa Cosmoclimatologica. ​That would be interesting.
 
As we approach the first anniversary of the publication of the seminal Svensmark et al 2017, it occurs to me that the next step for Svensmark and Shaviv could very well be a grand synthesis, a sort of Summa Cosmoclimatologica. ​That would be interesting.

It’s only seminal in the sense you went through an entire box of Kleenex.
 
Here Brad Keyes deconstructs the absurd "consensus" argument.

[FONT=&quot]97% consensus[/FONT]
[h=1]Oreskes, Harvard and the Destruction of Scientific Revolutions[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest post by Bradley Keyes consensus (kənˈsɛnsəs) — n. general or widespread agreement (esp. in the phrase consensus of opinion ) usage Since ‘consensus’ refers to a collective opinion, the words ‘of opinion’ in the phrase ‘consensus of opinion’ are redundant and should therefore be avoided Source: consensus. Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition.…
[/FONT]
 
[h=1]Venerable CliScis Fire Off Shots in Rapid Response to GWPF ‘Contrarian Pseudo-Rebuttal’: Shoot Themselves in Feet[/h]Posted on 23 Dec 18 by JAIME JESSOP 9 Comments
Eminent Meteorology Professor J. Ray Bates has written a paper for the GWPF about the discrepancies between the scientific case for climate change concern set out in AR5 WG1 and the more urgent, quite obviously politically motivated, less robustly evidenced climate alarmism in SR15. It’s a fairly long paper. I intend to concentrate …
 
Back
Top Bottom