One year in, Trump's environmental agenda is already taking a measurable toll[W:78]

camlok said:

Yes, let's let stunningly ignorant Intelligent Design advocates determine questions of science.

Rank stupidity. It catches on everywhere it is tried.

Click to expand...

camlok said:

Why should it annoy you? None of us were born knowin', you know. Americans are stunningly ignorant of how the English language works. Americans are stunningly ignorant of the science of 911.

Now you know how I feel with all the dunces who don't know anything about the science of 911.

Yet I can explain it to them when they are totally clueless about anything about it.

Here is the problem I have. A bunch of folks with no apparent scientific expertise advance a lot of things which most actual scientists don't agree with. This is, or at least seems to me to be just another bunch of folks repeating the memes of the extremely wealthy and well known propagandists behind this anti-GW thing.

It's the same types, likely the same money as the Intelligent Design folks who phrase their "science" as if it means something when it really doesn't. When it got boiled down to its essence it was the equivalent of the Scopes Monkey Trial.

Click to expand...

Jack Hays said:

Alarmism / EPA / Politics
[h=1]Green Heads Exploding: Scott Pruitt Suggests Global Warming Could be Beneficial[/h]Guest essay by Eric Worrall President Trump’s EPA Director Scott Pruitt has upset greens by suggesting that since humans have historically flourished during warm periods, global warming might be beneficial. Pruitt suggests warming can help humans Scott Waldman and Niina Heikkinen, E&E News reporters Published: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt questioned…

Click to expand...

polgara said:

Greetings, Jack. :2wave:

Excellent article! :thumbs: Trump pulled our country out of the Paris Accord as one of his first acts after being elected POTUS, which many agreed was a smart move, since the Accord appeared to be little more than a way for the UN to charge us billions of dollars to help other countries meet the goals they themselves voluntarily established on AGW! This would doubtless finally bankrupt us, since we have a $21 trillion, and growing, dollar debt that is already costing us millions of dollars per year in interest charges alone! Of course mention should also be made of the exchanges that were set up by the already wealthy to make money via selling and/or buying carbon credits, but that's another topic.

Kudos to Pruitt for shocking and probably outraging the "greenies" by stating that a warmer earth is to be celebrated, not demonized! :mrgreen: I'd be interested in hearing their arguments in favor of a colder, not warmer, climate on earth, since history has shown us that more deaths always occur when it's colder, not only because of starvation, since food crops need warmth to grow, but also because many millions of people around the earth simply do not have the means of finding fuel to stay warm.

:rantoff:

Click to expand...