• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Manufacturing the Climate "Consensus"

Why do you keep referring to ancient graphs that don't show the reduction in solar activity over the last couple of decades? Anyone would think you were trying to hide something.

They are hard to find without finding the data and plotting a graph yourself. The powers that hold the billions of dollars of grant money don't pay researchers to do very many modern solar study papers.

Again...


Follow the money!!!
 
They are hard to find without finding the data and plotting a graph yourself. The powers that hold the billions of dollars of grant money don't pay researchers to do very many modern solar study papers.

Again...


Follow the money!!!

The people who publish this journal every month are so disappointed to hear from a paragon of science such as yourself that there is no research being done in this area anymore.

Solar Physics - Springer

I guess all the grant money is tied up in that giant conspiracy, where governments are desperate to spend money on nonexistent problems because libruls.
 
From the "Fraudulent Science" Department:

[h=2]Fracking paper overstated size of methane leak from Marcellus Shale, earning retraction[/h]with one comment
[FONT=&quot]via Greens-EFA
[/FONT]​
[FONT=&quot]Last spring, a group of environmental scientists reported an impressive finding: Hydraulic fracturing (better known as fracking) in the Marcellus Shale region of the eastern United States was leaking enough methane to power a city twice the size of Washington, D.C. (We didn’t come up with that comparison, apt though it may be.)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Turns out that wasn’t true. Read the rest of this entry »[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
 
[h=2]Lewandowsky’s genius solution to Fake News — Ban it and do cheap smears![/h]
Our old friend Stephan Lewandowsky has had a brain wave: h/t to Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods.
This Bristol academic thinks he has the solution to fake news
A Bristol professor has told MPs they have the power to put a stop to fake news appearing on Facebook and other social media platforms.
It is possible for a regulation or law to be passed that tells those IT giants how to behave,” said the cognitive scientist,…
Knock me over. Who would have thought of that – apart from every dictator and tyrant for the last 5,000 years? . . .
 
Back
Top Bottom