• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Confirmation of the Pause, 2002-2012

Jack Hays said:

[h=1]Proof that the recent global warming slowdown is statistically significant (at the 99% confidence level)[/h]Guest analysis by Sheldon Walker Introduction In this article I will present convincing evidence that the recent slowdown was statistically significant (at the 99% confidence level). I will describe the method that I used in detail, so that other people can duplicate my results. By definition, the warming rate during a slowdown must be less…
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

Complete gibberish. Sheldon Walker is clearly not a statistician. His "analysis" is nothing of the sort - it's just playing with the numbers. Why do you keep citing this crap from WUWT? You've already been caught out quoting Watts's nonsense, and his "guest analyses" are just as idiotic.

The thing is, whether there was a pause or not depends entirely on how you define what a pause is. It has no physical significance. Heaven knows why you deniers remain so obsessed with it - you might as well discuss the number of angels able to dance on a pinhead.
 
Surface Detail said:
Complete gibberish. Sheldon Walker is clearly not a statistician. His "analysis" is nothing of the sort - it's just playing with the numbers. Why do you keep citing this crap from WUWT? You've already been caught out quoting Watts's nonsense, and his "guest analyses" are just as idiotic.

The thing is, whether there was a pause or not depends entirely on how you define what a pause is. It has no physical significance. Heaven knows why you deniers remain so obsessed with it - you might as well discuss the number of angels able to dance on a pinhead.
Click to expand...

I'm not aware of anything that would be called "Watts's nonsense." I'm aware of your nonsensical attacks on Watts. Perhaps that's what you meant?
As for obsession, it was warmists' obsessive attempts to erase or deny The Pause that made it an issue.
 
Surface Detail said:
Why do you keep citing this crap from WUWT?
Click to expand...

WUWT is the #1 rated weather blog.

Climate News
[h=1]Oh gosh, this is going to cause some heads to explode[/h]People send me stuff….sometimes it’s hate mail, sometimes it’s requests for research, sometimes it’s silly science. I didn’t expect this one. Today I got this notice in the email. Name: Anuj Agarwal Email: xxxxxxx Message: Hi Watts Up With That Team, My name is Anuj Agarwal. I’m Founder of Feedspot. I would like to personally congratulate you as…
 
Jack Hays said:
WUWT is the #1 rated weather blog.

Climate News
[h=1]Oh gosh, this is going to cause some heads to explode[/h]People send me stuff….sometimes it’s hate mail, sometimes it’s requests for research, sometimes it’s silly science. I didn’t expect this one. Today I got this notice in the email. Name: Anuj Agarwal Email: xxxxxxx Message: Hi Watts Up With That Team, My name is Anuj Agarwal. I’m Founder of Feedspot. I would like to personally congratulate you as…
Click to expand...

HotWhopper: Anthony Watts gets over-excited by a meaningless weather (not climate) "award"
 
Threegoofs said:
That’s....not even remotely the point.
Click to expand...

If you could set aside your prejudice for a moment you would see that WUWT is grouped with the sites whose primary output is data, while the "top 40" group is for sites that primarily produce commentary.
 
Jack Hays said:
If you could set aside your prejudice for a moment you would see that WUWT is grouped with the sites whose primary output is data, while the "top 40" group is for sites that primarily produce commentary.
Click to expand...

Again, not the point.
 
Jack Hays said:
I suggest you take a look at the global warming top 40 list before you go any further. It has as many skeptics as believers. Btw, RealClimate is on the same list as WUWT.
Click to expand...

Besides. The award 3G is thrilled about has to do with volume, not quality.
 
From Gavin Schmidt as NASA:

Statistical correction of global temperatures with the effect of La Niña and El Niño (ENSO):

d1c52a7f01d975d95f2a492777915718.jpg


Looks like temps are still rising...
 
So you're saying we made the air cleaner, water safer, electronics more efficient and became more energy independent all for nothing?
 

[h=1]The global warming cure[/h]Guest fiction by Sheldon Walker Imagine that scientists have developed a cure for global warming. But there is a catch. The cure can only be used one time, and it will only last for 10 years. Warning: the following story is not real. It is fiction, science fiction. However, most of the “facts” that are…
Continue reading →
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom