Russell797
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
- Messages
- 4,394
- Reaction score
- 1,063
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Actually not so. Those who would denigrate the solar/GCR hypothesis invariably ignore all the solar factors except irradiance. That's their error.
[h=2]Climate debate at the Cambridge Union - a 10 minute summary of the main problems with the standard alarmist polemic[/h]
The error is on your part in taking an unsubstantiated hypothesis as evidence of something...It is not.