Surface Detail
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
- Messages
- 3,244
- Reaction score
- 1,232
- Location
- English Midlands
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
They certainly can “count” as an ad hominem if they are cravenly used to attack his research whilst being completely irrelevant to it. Meh, typical Jack. Science denial and rank dishonesty have few limits.
Also, the idea that he was harsh toward one female and nice to one guy does not make him a misogynist. Your whole argument is ****ing pathetic.
Yup. There is no issue that Jack will not attempt to twist to his own ends.