Start here.
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-7.html
No, you are the one acting on faith. I base my opinion on evidence, you are making stark claims and denying evidence. Remember the CO2 chart? Only a fanatic would reject it. Speaking of more faith-based arguments:
You're under the absurd assumption your vague memory of winter temperatures is valid scientific data. Human memory is simply incapable of statistically analyzing fractions of a degree over decades of time
purely from memory. It is utterly astounding that anyone thinks they can make such a claim off the top of their head. Here's some data:
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/has-canadas-climate-already-changed/11016
Toronto's winters have, in fact, gotten warmer. But your
faith said it hasn't, just like your
faith said the CO2 chart is wrong.
I am not interested in the claims of a politician regarding a complicated scientific topic.
Your dishonesty is noted. I have not done any fearmongering here. You're unable to admit that. My point is proven.
Show everyone where I did that, you liar.
I've seen it. They lie to you. Here are three I remember off the top of my head:
1) They take a man's statement out of context. Remember the guy talking about how there's so much CO2 in the oceans? The way it's in the film, they make it sound like he's saying out CO2 contributions are insignificant because the ocean dwarfs our influence. In context, he was actually explaining that the ocean CO2 reservoir makes our influence MORE dangerous: because if we warm up the planet a little, the ocean releases more CO2 which will amplify our impact. Don't believe me? Google the guy. He's publicly protested how they used his statements.
2) Blatantly cherry picking data. They show you a nice chart of solar activity vs. temperature, showing the correlation. And then suddenly they cut off the chart... right as the correlation breaks down. See, more recently the earth's temperature continued to rise while solar activity leveled off. Funny how they cut that off. Why wouldn't they show it to you?
3) The best was outright fabrication of data. They showed you a chart claiming most of the warming occurred before 1940. They attributed that chart to NASA. NASA's actual data differs, most of the warming most definitely occurred after 1940. Fabricating data is lying. Why would they lie to you?
I bet you don't remember these three points in the film. I bet you've never even watched it. We'll find out in your response when you claim ignorance or dodge