• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

According to Computer Models the Universe Should Not Exist

LowDown

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
So what are you doing, sitting there existing? Don't you believe in science?

The universe shouldn’t technically exist, according to top scientists who have spent their careers trying to figure out how the beginning of everything didn’t immediately destroy itself.

The current model for the birth of the universe predicts that equal parts of matter and antimatter were produced by the Big Bang.

But, since matter and antimatter are identical except for their opposite electrical charges, they annihilate each other... When the two collide, they combust in a violent eruption, meaning none of anything should be here today.
Click to expand...

As these scientists acknowledge, when the computer outputs don't match reality it means that there is something they don't know, something wrong with the model. It does not mean that they should go around insisting that we don't exist.

The universe shouldn’t exist, according to science | New York Post
 
LowDown said:
So what are you doing, sitting there existing? Don't you believe in science?



As these scientists acknowledge, when the computer outputs don't match reality it means that there is something they don't know, something wrong with the model. It does not mean that they should go around insisting that we don't exist.

The universe shouldn’t exist, according to science | New York Post
Click to expand...


We aren't depending on such models for our argument. I like to point to the Global Satellite Temperatures.

Another model I've seen referenced recently:

Report: GOP Tax Framework Could Raise GDP By 5%, Wages By 7%

Simulating The Republican “Unified Framework” Tax Plan

...
this study uses the Global Gaidar Model (GGM). The GGM is a global 17-region, 90-period,
overlapping-generations model, which is closely calibrated to U.N. demographic and IMF
fiscal data.
...
Click to expand...
 
It just says like normal, our modeling is as poor as our understanding of the sciences involved.
 
Astronomy
[h=1]Our dizzy Universe: Hubble discovers ‘wobbling galaxies’[/h]From the ESA/HUBBLE INFORMATION CENTRE Hubble discovers ‘wobbling galaxies’ Observations may hint at nature of dark matter Using the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have discovered that the brightest galaxies within galaxy clusters “wobble” relative to the cluster’s centre of mass. This unexpected result is inconsistent with predictions made by the current standard model of dark…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom