• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Core of the AGW Science Defective

Paleoclimatology
[h=1]Climate Model Projections Significantly Diverge from Paleoclimate Analogs[/h]By Renee Hannon Introduction Over the past million years, our Earth displays a rhythmic beat when exiting full glacial cycles and entering interglacial warm periods. The characteristics and duration of these systematic warm periods provide an excellent dataset to help prognoses of future climate patterns. Astronomical Milankovitch cycles play a major role and trigger internal…
 
Jetboogieman said:
Yeah but it isn't really your opinion is it?

It's the mountains of right wing echo chamber blogs you appear to consume daily.
Click to expand...

Any scholar consumes a lot of information provided by others and then synthesizes his or her own opinion or thesis. It's pretty ignorant to suppose that anyone can come up with a thesis de novo, out of whole cloth. Even in huffing and puffing about a right wing echo chamber you echo the nonsense coming from the usual suspects. It's an invalid criticism uttered in bad faith.
 
Aristaeus said:
Where is this scientist with evidence that AGW is not real? It only takes one scientist to prove gravity doesn't exist, so should we stop believing in gravity?

There is a very good reason why AGW has been regarded as a fact by virtually all climatologists for the past 40 years. Wanna take a stab as to why?
Click to expand...

We all think that global warming is real, fool. We have doubts about how severe it will be and what can be done about it, just like a lot of the climate scientists do.

Try not to post like a frigging mind numbed robot.
 
LowDown said:
We all think that global warming is real, fool. We have doubts about how severe it will be and what can be done about it, just like a lot of the climate scientists do.

Try not to post like a frigging mind numbed robot.
Click to expand...

Really, I've spent years reading forum posts from conservatives trying to disprove that temperatures are rising, etc.
 
Aristaeus said:
What is your scientific education in this field, and what peer-reviewed research have you done that indicates that 97%+ of climatologists around the world have been wrong for the past 40 years?
Click to expand...

You mean back since the 70s when they were calling for climate cooling? They blow with the wind and the money.
 

[h=1]Analysis says NOAA global temperature data ‘doesn’t constitute a “smoking gun” for global warming’[/h]Mikhail Voloshin writes this detailed analysis of NOAA and GISTEMP climate data processing on his Facebook page: Random Walk analysis of NOAA global temperature anomaly data Summary The global temperature record doesn’t demonstrate an upward trend. It doesn’t demonstrate a lack of upward trend either. Temperature readings today are about 0.75°C higher than they were when…
Continue reading →
 
[h=1]Dueling science: Yesterday – “Soil will accelerate global warming” Today – “Soil holds potential to slow global warming”[/h]Yesterday, I posted a press release on a paper that suggested soil was going to accelerate global warming. Now today, we have the opposite; “Soil holds potential to slow global warming”. Collectively, I don’t think climate science has a clue either way. Climate solution in soil? Soil holds potential to slow global warming, Stanford researchers…
Continue reading →
 
[h=1]News From Vostok Ice Cores[/h]Guest essay by Richard Taylor Introduction Our current understanding climate was influenced profoundly by the publication (J.R. Petit, et al., 1999) of deuterium (2H) measurements from metre 8 to metre 3310 of the Vostok ice-core, indicating the temperature of the nearby atmosphere from 1800 to 421000 BC. Some authorities claim, and many believe, that unprecedented…

2 days ago October 6, 2017 in Antarctic, Paleoclimatology.
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=1]News From Vostok Ice Cores[/h]Guest essay by Richard Taylor Introduction Our current understanding climate was influenced profoundly by the publication (J.R. Petit, et al., 1999) of deuterium (2H) measurements from metre 8 to metre 3310 of the Vostok ice-core, indicating the temperature of the nearby atmosphere from 1800 to 421000 BC. Some authorities claim, and many believe, that unprecedented…

2 days ago October 6, 2017 in Antarctic, Paleoclimatology.
Click to expand...
I wonder if they could not use the area around where they recovered the WWII P-38 Glacier Girl.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacier_Girl
Since they have a fairly precise start date and know the ice built up 268 feet between 1942 and 1992.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Yep. Can't forget that one.

82 meters of ice in 50 years...
Click to expand...

Since the period in question is not covered by Vostok, it could fill in some of the data with high resolution,
over a meter a year, is very high resolution.
 
longview said:
I wonder if they could not use the area around where they recovered the WWII P-38 Glacier Girl.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacier_Girl
Since they have a fairly precise start date and know the ice built up 268 feet between 1942 and 1992.
Click to expand...

Verse from Air Force drinking song Give Me Operations:

Don't give me a P-38,
The props they counter-rotate
You'll loop, roll, and spin, but then auger right in,
Don't give me a P-38!
 
[h=1]A paleoclimatology tool is shown to give false positives[/h]A popular tool to trace Earth’s oxygen history can give false positives From the GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and the “settled science” department: For researchers pursuing the primordial history of oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere, a new study might sour some “Eureka!” moments. A contemporary tool used to trace oxygen by examining ancient rock strata can…
Continue reading →
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom