• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top Scientists Warn: Sea Gods Angry!

LowDown

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
● Kirk Cameron: God sends hurricanes to teach us to repent.

● Jennifer Lawrence: ‘Mother Nature’s Rage’ Directed at U.S. Because of Trump.

● Politico Magazine: As Hurricane Irma prepares to strike, it’s worth remembering that Mother Nature never intended us to live here [in Florida].

In other news, Tweet of the Day:

Sea Gods.JPG
 
LowDown said:
● Kirk Cameron: God sends hurricanes to teach us to repent.
● Jennifer Lawrence: ‘Mother Nature’s Rage’ Directed at U.S. Because of Trump.
● Politico Magazine: As Hurricane Irma prepares to strike, it’s worth remembering that Mother Nature never intended us to live here [in Florida].
In other news, Tweet of the Day:
Click to expand...

We all know based on your post history that you are absolutely ****ing clueless what a scientist is and isn't, but none of the three are. Then again, even Jennifer Lawrence is more qualified than the Wordpress bloggers you tend to cite.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
We all know based on your post history that you are absolutely ****ing clueless what a scientist is and isn't, but none of the three are. Then again, even Jennifer Lawrence is more qualified than the Wordpress bloggers you tend to cite.
Click to expand...

We all know that based on your history of posts you know nothing about nothing and are not worthy of even a click. I have absolutely no further use for you. Have a nice day.
 
LowDown said:
We all know that based on your history of posts you know nothing about nothing and are not worthy of even a click. I have absolutely no further use for you. Have a nice day.
Click to expand...

When you can show me that any of the three people/organizations you quote are degreed scientists top in their field, I'll admit this thread wasn't more of your daily partisan garbage you vomit onto this forum.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
When you can show me that any of the three people/organizations you quote are degreed scientists top in their field, I'll admit this thread wasn't more of your daily partisan garbage you vomit onto this forum.
Click to expand...

Can anyone blame me for never responding to you?
 
LowDown said:
Can anyone blame me for never responding to you?
Click to expand...

It's mostly because you're intellectually incapable of defending your own positions, so you abandon ship as soon as possible. So can we safely assume you don't have any evidence that these are "top scientists" as you claimed?

Mods, seeing as how this was a joke thread, can we have it moved to 'On the lighter side' or 'Conspiracy theories'?
 
RabidAlpaca said:
It's mostly because you're intellectually incapable of defending your own positions, so you abandon ship as soon as possible. So can we safely assume you don't have any evidence that these are "top scientists" as you claimed?

Mods, seeing as how this was a joke thread, can we have it moved to 'On the lighter side' or 'Conspiracy theories'?
Click to expand...

That's pretty funny. You've never actually responded to any of my posts in a substantive manner. You're nothing but this ad hominem stuff.

And now you're trying to silence me by having my posts moved to obscure topics. Pretty shabby. I suppose that's all you've got.
 
LowDown said:
That's pretty funny. You've never actually responded to any of my posts in a substantive manner. You're nothing but this ad hominem stuff.

And now you're trying to silence me by having my posts moved to obscure topics. Pretty shabby. I suppose that's all you've got.
Click to expand...

If this isn't a joke thread, then where is your evidence? Show us that these are top scientists.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
If this isn't a joke thread, then where is your evidence? Show us that these are top scientists.
Click to expand...

Oh brother...

Yeah, "top scientists" like those three I mentioned, Mickey Mouse, Howdy Doody, It, The Creature from the Black Lagoon, Bill Nye, Rosie O'Donnell, etc.
 
LowDown said:
Oh brother...
Yeah, "top scientists" like those three I mentioned, Mickey Mouse, Howdy Doody, It, The Creature from the Black Lagoon, Bill Nye, Rosie O'Donnell, etc.
Click to expand...

So you're saying this is a serious thread and that Jennifer Lawrence, Mickey Mouse and Howdy Doody are scientists? I guess we're back to my original reponse: You haven't the slightest ****ing idea what is and isn't a scientist, which explains most of your confusion when it comes to scientific topics.
 
LowDown said:
● Kirk Cameron: God sends hurricanes to teach us to repent.

● Jennifer Lawrence: ‘Mother Nature’s Rage’ Directed at U.S. Because of Trump.

● Politico Magazine: As Hurricane Irma prepares to strike, it’s worth remembering that Mother Nature never intended us to live here [in Florida].

In other news, Tweet of the Day:

View attachment 67222605
Click to expand...

Check out the trend in the chart below. Turns out that hurricanes are a little more frequent lately, and more powerful. Since charts are complicated, let me help: in the last 10 years 2006 to 2015, we have had more than 15 named storms 5 times. 1996 to 2005, 4 years had 15 or more named storms. The 10 years prior, one, the 10 years before that, 0.

Atlantic_Storm_Count.jpg

Oh, and you should probably learn what a scientist is. You list none.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
When you can show me that any of the three people/organizations you quote are degreed scientists top in their field, I'll admit this thread wasn't more of your daily partisan garbage you vomit onto this forum.
Click to expand...

Any chance that you can cite any particular scientist that says that the thing they are specialist about is going to actually cause trouble?
 
Tim the plumber said:
Any chance that you can cite any particular scientist that says that the thing they are specialist about is going to actually cause trouble?
Click to expand...

I'll consider answering your off-topic questions when my on-topic question is answered. Can you show that any of the people the OP mentioned are "top scientists" or even scientists at all? I think you might have a hard time like him telling the difference.
 
Redress said:
Check out the trend in the chart below. Turns out that hurricanes are a little more frequent lately, and more powerful. Since charts are complicated, let me help: in the last 10 years 2006 to 2015, we have had more than 15 named storms 5 times. 1996 to 2005, 4 years had 15 or more named storms. The 10 years prior, one, the 10 years before that, 0.

View attachment 67222619

Oh, and you should probably learn what a scientist is. You list none.
Click to expand...

OK, but remember a very, very important detail....

The number is rather high for the 30's to 50's considering we had no satellites and only relied on observation...
 
RabidAlpaca said:
I'll consider answering your off-topic questions when my on-topic question is answered. Can you show that any of the people the OP mentioned are "top scientists" or even scientists at all? I think you might have a hard time like him telling the difference.
Click to expand...

I think that is the point.

The general hype of doom is driven not by scientists (well very very few scientists) but by people who come out with stuff that others lap up and deeply believe. In a faith way. You are a prime example of this.
 
Redress said:
Check out the trend in the chart below. Turns out that hurricanes are a little more frequent lately, and more powerful. Since charts are complicated, let me help: in the last 10 years 2006 to 2015, we have had more than 15 named storms 5 times. 1996 to 2005, 4 years had 15 or more named storms. The 10 years prior, one, the 10 years before that, 0.

View attachment 67222619

Oh, and you should probably learn what a scientist is. You list none.
Click to expand...

Amazingly as we have the ability to track and see storms that couldn't be seen 50-60 years ago at sea, the numbers go up..

Coincidence or is it a conspiracy?
 
Renae said:
Amazingly as we have the ability to track and see storms that couldn't be seen 50-60 years ago at sea, the numbers go up..

Coincidence or is it a conspiracy?
Click to expand...

"named storms' LOL that's real scientific.

Mann:" whew boy it's raining out there"
Schmidt:It is? quick lets give that thing a name so can jack that storm graph up"
LAFF


This is more useful.global_running_ace.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom