- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 6,968
- Reaction score
- 1,563
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Peer-reviewed papers that contradicted manmade global warming have been found flawed in a new review.
https://qz.com/1069298/the-3-of-scientific-papers-that-deny-climate-change-are-all-flawed/
Broadly, there were three main errors in the papers denying climate change. Many had cherry-picked the results that conveniently supported their conclusion, while ignoring other context or records. Then there were some that applied inappropriate “curve-fitting”—in which they would step farther and farther away from data until the points matched the curve of their choosing.
And of course, sometimes the papers just ignored physics altogether. “In many cases, shortcomings are due to insufficient model evaluation, leading to results that are not universally valid but rather are an artifact of a particular experimental setup,” the authors write.
Those who assert that these papers are correct while the other 97% are wrong are holding up science where the researchers had already decided what results they sought, the authors of the review say. Good science is objective—it doesn’t care what anyone wants the answers to be.
https://qz.com/1069298/the-3-of-scientific-papers-that-deny-climate-change-are-all-flawed/