• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Sky is Falling

Absentglare said:
That point wasn't addressing those predictions, it was addressing the statement i emphasized in bold font.
Click to expand...

The portion you bolded was just a supporting point for your interlocutor. The thread is about the four numbered predictions.
 
Jack Hays said:
The portion you bolded was just a supporting point for your interlocutor. The thread is about the four numbered predictions.
Click to expand...

Then you agree that the bold statement i was criticizing is inappropriate.
 
vegas giants said:
The santer study is not a scientific paper?
Click to expand...

Well, given that the first few were not and you had not bothered to quote from them I did not pay much attention to what was obviously the religious tactic of spewing fourth a load of too long to read drivel.

What point were you making and what does this paper have to say to support it?
 
Tim the plumber said:
Well, given that the first few were not and you had not bothered to quote from them I did not pay much attention to what was obviously the religious tactic of spewing fourth a load of too long to read drivel.

What point were you making and what does this paper have to say to support it?
Click to expand...

Yes you were not paying attention and went right to the AGW denier script. You have such an open mind. Lol
 
[h=2]Climate bargain, going cheap! Pay now, save $Trillions, stop Storms, Droughts, Bad Stuff. Ends today![/h]
[h=3]Hurry Now and Save Trillions![/h][h=4]A 500 trillion, gazillion dollar bill is coming for you unless you buy my solar-panel-techno-wind-battery gizmo NOW! Don’t miss out. You too, can be a world saving star for a bargain price. Free planet with nice weather thrown in. Offer ends at midnight.[/h]Seriously, have you always wanted to stop storms, vermin, disease, plagues, hunger, poverty, droughts, floods, and shrinking fish and chips?
All of this and much more if you just pay up now, pay today, pay tomorrow, and hock your children’s future.
Hands up who wants to be a hero?
​
Who needs an economist to calculate the biggest bill you’ve ever seen? (It’s a record, the Largest Ever Bill in Four Million Years! )
[h=3]World’s young face $535 trillion bill for climate[/h]The next generation will have to pay a $535 trillion bill to tackle climate change, relying on unproven and speculative technology.
LONDON, 19 July, 2017 – One of the world’s most famous climate scientists has just calculated the financial burden that tomorrow’s young citizens will face to keep the globe at a habitable temperature and contain global warming and climate change – a $535 trillion bill.
And much of that will go on expensive technologies engineered to suck 1,000 billion metric tons of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the air by the year 2100.
Of course, if humans started to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6% a year right now, the end of the century challenge would be to take 150 billion tonnes from the atmosphere, and most of this could be achieved simply by better forest and agricultural management, according to a new study in the journal Earth System Dynamics.
People who don’t buy up this great offer are Selfish, Scumbag Deniers, who are hurting their children, practically pedophiles, and definitely fools who should never be invited to your dinner parties, ever! Mankind controls the Climate. This is Science, totally scientific, as certain as Gravity, Penicillin and Planes, and only a charlatan shill for fossil fuels would even ask about the error bars. Don’t trust anyone who does!
Only days to go before the Sale of the Century closes.
 
This is just sad. The deniers have abandoned science for marketing now
 
Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
Well, given that the first few were not and you had not bothered to quote from them I did not pay much attention to what was obviously the religious tactic of spewing fourth a load of too long to read drivel.

What point were you making and what does this paper have to say to support it?
Click to expand...
vegas giants said:
Yes you were not paying attention and went right to the AGW denier script. You have such an open mind. Lol
Click to expand...

So what was your point?
 
Jack Hays said:
Try this. Start a thread debunking climate models, and see who attacks you.
Click to expand...

If we're going off on our own tangents to deflect, i can point out that skepticism suggests caution over recklessness.
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=1]MSM on Climate Hype: “the worst case is the only thing that prompts us to get anything done”[/h]Guest essay by Eric Worrall According to the Sydney Morning Herald, telling the truth about climate doesn’t work. Hyping extreme climate scenarios is sometimes the only way to motivate climate action. How Y2K offers a lesson for fighting climate change Earlier this month, New York magazine published a riveting and frightening look at the future…
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

You can bet your life that there is no basis behind this article, as it is put forward by pretend-expert Watts, who is not even a scientist, much less a climatologist. A puppet of fossil-fuel industry rhetoric.
 
Media_Truth said:
You can bet your life that there is no basis behind this article, as it is put forward by pretend-expert Watts, who is not even a scientist, much less a climatologist. A puppet of fossil-fuel industry rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Repeating a lie does not make it less false.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom