- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,489
- Reaction score
- 28,834
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
That isn't peer review. That isn't reviewing the science. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Which brings me to the final point I will make on the lack of scientific gravitas of an IPCC report: If it was an actual scientific paper there would be a chance that it would not be published... there is no such threat for an IPCC-AR because they self-publish.
Odd... because climate scientists think the IPCC is peer reviewed.
But you don't.
And given the fact that the IPCC *is* published, and is accepted as peer reviewed scientific material in any climate journal as a reference makes your bleating about the process a bit.. amateurish.