• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Ugly Attacks of AGW Advocates

Lord of Planar said:
At least alarmist is correct, whereas denialist isn't.

We are not denying the facts seen of AGW. We do deny the religious type fearmongering that surrounds it. Past prophesies of AGW have not come to light, and we do not expect current prophesies of your fanatical religion to either.
Click to expand...

Says the guy that denies there is a scientific consensus when every single scientific organization on the planet says there is.

[emoji849]
 
Threegoofs said:
Says the guy that denies there is a scientific consensus when every single scientific organization on the planet says there is.

[emoji849]
Click to expand...

What is the consensus of Catholic Cardinals on the immaculate conception?

Is there a greater authority than this?
 
SirGareth said:
What is the consensus of Catholic Cardinals on the immaculate conception?

Is there a greater authority than this?
Click to expand...

Their religious like consensus is no better than your example.
 
Sunsettommy said:
Yeah they are deep into their fallacies.
Click to expand...

Somehow, every major scientific organization in the world stating AGW is real and and impending problem is ‘religion’ and ‘fallacy’

I’m not sure what can produce this level of delusion.

This probably explains, however, why both posters are proudly ‘ignoring’ me.

It’s hard to stick with an obviously nutty proposition when people constantly remind you of how bat**** crazy it is. Better to not see it.
 
Sunsettommy said:
Yeah they are deep into their fallacies.
Click to expand...

What they seem not to get is that almost all the so-called deniers acknowledge AGW is real. We just disagree that most of the warming increases are caused by greenhouse gas increases. Yes, some warming probably is. There are natural events in play, especially time lagged solar changes. There are land use changes and soot on ice. They tend to ignore all other warming variables except CO2.
 
Lord of Planar said:
What they seem not to get is that almost all the so-called deniers acknowledge AGW is real. We just disagree that most of the warming increases are caused by greenhouse gas increases. Yes, some warming probably is. There are natural events in play, especially time lagged solar changes. There are land use changes and soot on ice. They tend to ignore all other warming variables except CO2.
Click to expand...

But... all the scientific organizations say it’s definitely greenhouse gases.

And they all say it’s a real issue.

And you deny there’s a consensus.

Bat. ****. Crazy
 
Threegoofs said:
But... all the scientific organizations say it’s definitely greenhouse gases.

And they all say it’s a real issue.

And you deny there’s a consensus.

Bat. ****. Crazy
Click to expand...

Fine, they can all say the Jews aren't really human and the blacks shouldn't reproduce and "science" has said both.

The real issue is so what!

Just as Catholic Cardinals accept the immaculate conception as an article of faith, the socialists who fund the Climate Cult with our taxes require their adherence to the article of faith that the government should control everything. The Bishops and the Climate Cultists are entitled to believe whatever they want. It's the control thing that ends the discussion. We aren't going to start tithing to the Bishops or the Climate Cult.

 
Last edited:
EPA
[h=1]Futurism: Demanding Climate Data is Evil[/h]Guest essay by Eric Worrall According to Futurism author Lou Del Bello, demanding the data used in climate studies is evil because it leaves climate scientists open to having their work challenged. Scott Pruitt’s Latest EPA Gambit Is As Clever As It Is Evil Lou Del Bello The more information, the better, right? Except when…
 
The Consensus Enforcement Squad is coming.


[h=1]National Academies of Sciences goes into police mode over “misinformation”[/h]From the “adhere to the consensus or else!” department. Statement by NAS, NAE, and NAM Presidents on Effort to Counter Online Misinformation We are pleased to announce that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are exploring ways to mobilize our expertise to counter misinformation on the web related to science, engineering, and health. …
Continue reading →
 
Jack Hays said:
The Consensus Enforcement Squad is coming.


[h=1]National Academies of Sciences goes into police mode over “misinformation”[/h]From the “adhere to the consensus or else!” department. Statement by NAS, NAE, and NAM Presidents on Effort to Counter Online Misinformation We are pleased to announce that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are exploring ways to mobilize our expertise to counter misinformation on the web related to science, engineering, and health. …
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

Jack Hays...ever the champion of misinformation.

Statement by NAS, NAE, and NAM Presidents on Effort to Counter Online Misinformation


Viva La Désinformacion!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom