• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Climate Models for the Layman

I don't like to use the word "liar" so I'll just suggest your pants may be on fire. :flames::liar2

This guy is the biggest 'chancer' I've ever seen post here but with all he gets up to he's always good for a laugh :lol:
 
This guy is the biggest 'chancer' I've ever seen post here but with all he gets up to he's always good for a laugh :lol:

I think he has established a new low, moving data from one graph to another and then accusing his interlocutor of dishonesty.
 
I think he has established a new low, moving data from one graph to another and then accusing his interlocutor of dishonesty.

He's floundering with the same issue on two separate threads at the moment

Its great fun to watch
 
Why Are Climate-Change Models So Flawed?
Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe

. . . There is a popular theory that atmospheric CO2 amplifies the creation of water vapor, thereby increasing warming through a “positive feedback loop.” But that theory so far is mostly speculative; climate projections using models based on it have consistently failed, nearly always predicting far more warming than has occurred. It should go without saying that if scientists cannot yet make accurate predictions about future climate change, then their understanding of climate science remains highly incomplete. . . .
 
Back
Top Bottom