• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where Glaciers Are Growing[W:129]

soylentgreen said:
No, that is just it. I have no interest in a discussion.

No more than i am interested in taking a creationist seriously enough to bother with a discussion on that.

Unfortunately for the deniers they no longer have science to back them. All they have is pseudo science and very dishonest debate tricks. The only discussion worth having with them is to point out which particular fallacy they are trying this time.
Click to expand...

Ask him what convincing creationist arguments he's heard when discussing evolutionary science.

I would (and have) but he won't really address it.

It's pretty clear why.
 
soylentgreen said:
No, that is just it. I have no interest in a discussion.

No more than i am interested in taking a creationist seriously enough to bother with a discussion on that.

Unfortunately for the deniers they no longer have science to back them. All they have is pseudo science and very dishonest debate tricks. The only discussion worth having with them is to point out which particular fallacy they are trying this time.
Click to expand...

Thing is that if you had some sort of science that showed that we should take all this serriously you would want to talk about it.

I will use any flimsy excuse to talkk about the use of food as fuel killing millions of people per year. I want to spread the message that we should stop doing that. I want people to consider how many people are dying as a result of it. i want to discuss the numbers with them. I n this way I expect to spread the message that we are killing people faster than Hitler ever did and should stop it.

Your evaision shows that you would rather close your ears and eyes and just deny evidence than think because you are so committed to your chosen identity.
 
Threegoofs said:
Ask him what convincing creationist arguments he's heard when discussing evolutionary science.

I would (and have) but he won't really address it.

It's pretty clear why.
Click to expand...

I have never heard any such arguments from a creationist although I have formed one which I think reasonably implies a good chance that something is gardening the earth and humanity in particular... but it could all be chance.

Any prospect of you engaging in real debate on global warming?
 
Tim the plumber said:
Thing is that if you had some sort of science that showed that we should take all this serriously you would want to talk about it.

I will use any flimsy excuse to talkk about the use of food as fuel killing millions of people per year. I want to spread the message that we should stop doing that. I want people to consider how many people are dying as a result of it. i want to discuss the numbers with them. I n this way I expect to spread the message that we are killing people faster than Hitler ever did and should stop it.

Your evaision shows that you would rather close your ears and eyes and just deny evidence than think because you are so committed to your chosen identity.
Click to expand...

You lot really are pathetic in your assistance to be taken seriously as a science. You need to take some lessons from creationists on how to post pseudo rubbish.

It is not being evasive to ignore someone who really has nothing to say.

I am no longer interested in pandering to the climate deniers they deserve no better treatment than any other pseudo science begging to be taken seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom