- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,352
- Reaction score
- 28,653
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I would be happy with groups who would do honest research without a preconceived agenda of what conclusion they intend to reach.
Hmm. Maybe convening all the experts who study the issue together in a worldwide forum and they can carefully review all the published evidence and write a detailed report, carefully peer reviewing it for accuracy?
And maybe they could do this periodically, issuing reports every five years or so?
And of course, to assure its honest and does not have a 'preconcieved agenda', we can check what other highly respected scientific organizations, such as the National Academy of Science and the Royal Society, as well as the American Geophysical Union, and other societies representing Physics, Chemistry and Meteorology say.
I think that would be a great idea.