- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 3,931
- Reaction score
- 1,260
- Location
- Oz
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No, Cook et al's 2013 paper wasn't 'riddled with flaws'. A link to another conspiracy blog with a list of conspiracy blog posts and hit pieces from right-wing tabloids all repeating the same false claims? Really?cooks paper was riddled with flaws 97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus” | Climate Change Dispatch and no reasonable person argues otherwise. you need to prove that there is an overwhelming amount of agreement and you can't.
Once again, here's the more recently published 2016 paper you keep ignoring:
Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming