• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EPA Tells Alaskans to Freeze Rather than Burn Wood

Jack Hays said:
You were right and the OP (and therefore I) was wrong. Hats off.:surrender
Click to expand...

Wow that's a first jack. I have seen you post many many lies and I have seen those lies totally destroyed by many posters right, left and other WAY worse than this thread and you have never admitted it. Interesting.
Good move on your part posting this one instance of integrity. I hope it continues!!!
 
AGENT J said:
Wow that's a first jack. I have seen you post many many lies and I have seen those lies totally destroyed by many posters right, left and other WAY worse than this thread and you have never admitted it. Interesting.
Good move on your part posting this one instance of integrity. I hope it continues!!!
Click to expand...

"Integrity has no need of rules." --Albert Camus
 
Jack Hays said:
"Integrity has no need of rules." --Albert Camus
Click to expand...

but it has a definition

"In a person, integrity without consistency doesn't actually exist or reflect of their character" --Agent J
;)
 
Jack Hays said:
Really?
Click to expand...

AGENT J said:
Wow that's a first jack. I have seen you post many many lies and I have seen those lies totally destroyed by many posters right, left and other WAY worse than this thread and you have never admitted it. Interesting.
Good move on your part posting this one instance of integrity. I hope it continues!!!
Click to expand...

This was my actual post that you already replied to and yes really to my post, all of it. :shrug:
Seems you are about to go down a path that will already have me regretting giving your post kudos and that your posts was probably an isolated incident.
 
AGENT J said:
This was my actual post that you already replied to and yes really to my post, all of it. :shrug:
Seems you are about to go down a path that will already have me regretting giving your post kudos and that your posts was probably an isolated incident.
Click to expand...

I'm just curious what you think the "many lies" were.
 
Jack Hays said:
I'm just curious what you think the "many lies" were.
Click to expand...

Well I have no plans to derail your thread so you'll have to settle for that but I and many others have personally pointed out dishonesty, biased and lies in you posts. Due to rules of the forum there will be no further details on this in this thread. ;)
 
AGENT J said:
Well I have no plans to derail your thread so you'll have to settle for that but I and many others have personally pointed out dishonesty, biased and lies in you posts. Due to rules of the forum there will be no further details on this in this thread. ;)
Click to expand...

Fair enough. As you might expect, I disagree with the assessment.
 
humbolt said:
Yup. I can write my name - ah - never mind. But I have to add that crossing the "t" is tricky. Had to throw that in there.
Click to expand...

Try dotting the "i".
 
Didn't other Alaskans complain because, due to the particular climate, the smoke gets trapped around ground-level and everyone chokes? That, further, it's the oldest-fashioned cheapest word burning stoves that generally cause this?

I guess the answer depends on just how much you think your own claimed freedom should be allowed to intrude on a different claimed freedom of somebody else.
 
Jack Hays said:
You were right and the OP (and therefore I) was wrong. Hats off.
Click to expand...

Good job on admitting the thread title is completely dishonest. I'm curious though what changed? I don't see any NEW info posted.
 
Jack Hays said:
Some of my most effective criticism comes from within.
Click to expand...

So again, take me through it. You just read the thread title and your link again and your inner voice realized and said, "Oh yeah the EPA didn't actually do that at all and I should look deeper when using an article from thefederalist.com. Good job!
 
LaylaWindu said:
So again, take me through it. You just read the thread title and your link again and your inner voice realized and said, "Oh yeah the EPA didn't actually do that at all and I should look deeper when using an article from thefederalist.com. Good job!
Click to expand...

My inner dialogues are my own.
 
LaylaWindu said:
Good job on admitting the thread title is completely dishonest. I'm curious though what changed? I don't see any NEW info posted.
Click to expand...

I don't know whether it's relevant, but I noticed this thread quoted in another section of the forum in that interval.

Strictly speaking, Jack did not acknowledge either the viciousness in the thread title and his claim that "the EPA needs adult supervision. It would appear the EPA itself is more life-threatening to many Alaskans than are most natural phenomena," nor the dishonesty in maintaining those claims for ten pages in the face of all evidence. Only that he was 'wrong.'

But that's still better than nothing, where many others would have simply let the thread rest in peace :peace
 
Mithrae said:
I don't know whether it's relevant, but I noticed this thread quoted in another section of the forum in that interval.

Strictly speaking, Jack did not acknowledge either the viciousness in the thread title and his claim that "the EPA needs adult supervision. It would appear the EPA itself is more life-threatening to many Alaskans than are most natural phenomena," nor the dishonesty in maintaining those claims for ten pages in the face of all evidence. Only that he was 'wrong.'

But that's still better than nothing, where many others would have simply let the thread rest in peace :peace
Click to expand...

Yes better than nothing and I feel he had other motives. I'm keeping that feeling since he chooses not to explain himself, I think that hints my suspicions are right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom