• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prospects for a Prolonged Slowdown in Global Warming in the Early 21st Century

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Greatly slowed warming is entering the mainstream literature. The increasing weight of evidence is bending the discussion, despite the ideological rigidity of the most vociferous AGW advocates.


Prospects for a Prolonged Slowdown in Global Warming in the Early 21st Century

Posted on November 30, 2016 | 134 comments
by Nic Lewis
[W]e estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K/decade trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. – Knutson et al.
Continue reading

[W]e estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K/decade trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. – Knutson et al.

A new paper by Tom Knutson, Rong Zhang and Larry Horowitz of NOAA GFDL has just been published in Nature Communications [link to full manuscript]. The authors take a well-balanced approach to seeking possible explanations for global mean surface temperature (GMST) increasing at a much lower rate from around the turn of the century than over the late 20th century, and consider the possibility that it may continue for some time.
The abstract reads:
Observed global mean temperature over 1998 to 2015 increased at a slower rate (0.1 K decade-1) compared to the ensemble mean (forced) projected by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) models (0.2 K decade-1). Here we investigate the prospects for this slower rate to persist for a decade or more. The slower rate could persist if the transient climate response is overestimated by CMIP5 models by a factor of two, as suggested by recent low-end estimates. Alternatively, using CMIP5 models’ warming rate, the slower rate could still persist due to strong multidecadal internal variability cooling. Combining the CMIP5 ensemble warming rate with internal variability episodes from a single climate model – having the strongest multidecadal variability among CMIP5 models – we estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K decade-1 trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. . . .


 
Greatly slowed warming is entering the mainstream literature. The increasing weight of evidence is bending the discussion, despite the ideological rigidity of the most vociferous AGW advocates.


Prospects for a Prolonged Slowdown in Global Warming in the Early 21st Century

[FONT=&]Posted on November 30, 2016 | 134 comments[/FONT]
by Nic Lewis
[W]e estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K/decade trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. – Knutson et al.
Continue reading

[W]e estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K/decade trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. – Knutson et al.

A new paper by Tom Knutson, Rong Zhang and Larry Horowitz of NOAA GFDL has just been published in Nature Communications [link to full manuscript]. The authors take a well-balanced approach to seeking possible explanations for global mean surface temperature (GMST) increasing at a much lower rate from around the turn of the century than over the late 20th century, and consider the possibility that it may continue for some time.
The abstract reads:
Observed global mean temperature over 1998 to 2015 increased at a slower rate (0.1 K decade-1) compared to the ensemble mean (forced) projected by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) models (0.2 K decade-1). Here we investigate the prospects for this slower rate to persist for a decade or more. The slower rate could persist if the transient climate response is overestimated by CMIP5 models by a factor of two, as suggested by recent low-end estimates. Alternatively, using CMIP5 models’ warming rate, the slower rate could still persist due to strong multidecadal internal variability cooling. Combining the CMIP5 ensemble warming rate with internal variability episodes from a single climate model – having the strongest multidecadal variability among CMIP5 models – we estimate that the warming slowdown (< 0.1 K decade-1 trend beginning in 1998) could persist, due to internal variability cooling, through 2020, 2025 or 2030 with probabilities 16%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. . . .



the problem with global warming is that some parts of the country are warmer than others. for instance, Alabama has global warming from may-october while it may be much cooler in michagan
 
the problem with global warming is that some parts of the country are warmer than others. for instance, Alabama has global warming from may-october while it may be much cooler in michagan

0mw1I8e.gif
 

im assuming the global warming from the north differs from the global warming from the south summer time. this is just imo but i could be mistaken
 
the problem with global warming is that some Parts of the Country are warmer than others.
for instance, Alabama has global warming from may-october while it may be much cooler in michagan
That's NOT "a problem for Global Warming."
Global Warming is based on GLOBAL Averages.
It does not mean all parts of the Globe will warm Every Year, or even that the average will EVERY year.

Even more Laughable, you use "Parts of the COUNTRY," (Alabama/Michigan) as if it not only has to warm, but warm in every region/State of the USA... in every Season too.
You're kidding right?
Another Mind blowing denialist post, in yet another string of Thousands of Denialist BLOG dumps.


EDIT:
Below we see another Breathtaking 11Bravo post.
He doesn't even understand what "Global Warming" is/means.
Someone [else] explain it to him. I tried already, and it's Never worth a second post with him.
Dialogue is literally 'impossible.'
(one sees this on the "Right" alot)
 
Last edited:
That's NOT "a problem for Global Warming."
Global Warming is based on GLOBAL Averages.
It does not mean all parts of the Globe will warm Every Year, or even that the average will EVERY year.

Even more Laughable, you use "parts of the COUNTRY," as if it not only has to warm, but warm in every region of the USA... in every Season too.
You're kidding right?
Another Mind blowing denialist post, in yet another of Thousands of Denialist BLOG dumps.

i apologize if i offended you. what is it that i denied?
 
i apologize if i offended you. what is it that i denied?

Anyone who doesn't worship at the alter of the AGW dogma, is a denier, in their book.
 
...Global Warming is based on GLOBAL Averages...

The average of 49 and 51 is 50 and the average of 1 and 99 is also 50.
Weather stations record the High and the Low for each day. Reducing
that to an average has about as much meaning as the average telephone
number in New York City.
 
The average of 49 and 51 is 50 and the average of 1 and 99 is also 50.
Weather stations record the High and the Low for each day. Reducing
that to an average has about as much meaning as the average telephone
number in New York City.
I'm sorry, and AGAIN: Now several of the people in this string (and section in general), are just 'undebatable' for reasons that cannot be resolved by facts, nor elaborated here due to the rules.
Posting in this section was always problematic, now well into La La Land.
Perhaps the election encouraged many formerly (and thankfully) 'silent partisans' into becoming vocal in public.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom