• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arctic temps up to 26 degrees above normal - despite winter's onset

Jack Hays said:
If the explanation in #93 was not clear enough then perhaps this excerpt from the abstract will help.

To predict potential ice sheet-ocean-climate feedbacks, we must know the partitioning of freshwater fluxes from Greenland, including the conversion of icebergs to liquid (i.e., meltwater) fluxes within glacial fjords.
Click to expand...

So you can't describe it. You can only cut and paste.
 
Threegoofs said:
So you can't describe it. You can only cut and paste.
Click to expand...

There's no reason to substitute my my amateur formulation when an expert description is available. By identifying that expert description and providing it I'd say I have in fact described it.
 
Jack Hays said:
There's no reason to substitute my my amateur formulation when an expert description is available. By identifying that expert description and providing it I'd say I have in fact described it.
Click to expand...

And notably, a certain poster here steadfastly refuses to offer descriptions in his own words all the while claiming superior knowledge. It's remarkable that such a poster would deny the DP membership of such descriptions. I'd love to say it's rooted in humility, but I can't because it isn't.
 
No freshwater fluxes here.

Cx8O66lXEAAPub7.jpg:large
 
humbolt said:
And notably, a certain poster here steadfastly refuses to offer descriptions in his own words all the while claiming superior knowledge. It's remarkable that such a poster would deny the DP membership of such descriptions. I'd love to say it's rooted in humility, but I can't because it isn't.
Click to expand...

Guess you don't understand it either, huh?
 
KLATTU said:
What's the source of these temperature readings? do they line up with the satellite readings?

If it's Nasa-they are usually usually vastly different.

View attachment 67210177
Click to expand...

KLATTU said:
Can you trust Gavin Schmidt? ( that's rhetorical for you)

For those of us who inherently don't trust liberals, the Climategate and now the Wikileaks dumps pretty much confirm what we thought. The ends justify the means is the operative philosophy. Yeah, we were right.
Click to expand...

Can you trust the source of your graph?

Whoever created that graph needs to read the notes section of Woodfortrees and learn to create a more honest graph:

Wood for Trees: Notes

Just sayin'
 
Last edited:
Jack Hays said:
In one picture: why you shouldn’t get your climate information from the @dailykos

From the department of photoshopped bipolar behavior comes this hilarious photograph that accompanies a headline of doom from the leftist cesspool known as the Daily Kos. It just doesn’t get any better than this from the Kos kids. Thank you for making life entertaining with this epic failure. Tom Nelson spotted it and wrote in…
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

Well, there you go.

More proof it's all a hoax created by China.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom