• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

HCFC use limited in new treary

By this logic we should never do anything.

By this logic we should never pursue very expensive solutions to lightly understood problems where we have already made very expensive mistakes following mirage "solutions" unless either we are sure this time or else we are very very desperate.
 
By this logic we should never pursue very expensive solutions to lightly understood problems where we have already made very expensive mistakes following mirage "solution" unless either we are sure this time or else we are very very desperate.

So, I take it you're also against fiddling with dials on the earth's climate when we have a mediocre-at-best understanding of how it all works.
 
So, I take it you're also against fiddling with dials on the earth's climate when we have a mediocre-at-best understanding of how it all works.

If it is either very expensive or very much degrades our quality of life for sure not, and probably not in any case. I say best evidence and experience has us spending the vast majority of our time and money on adjusting our lives along side of the earth. I would however set in place programs and maybe even laws to keep the populations of humans down, that will do more than anything else will to SAVE THE PLANET.
 
And which quote leads you to this conclusion?

"Global deal on HFC greenhouse gases set to bring about ‘largest temperature reduction ever achieved by single agreement'"
 
"Global deal on HFC greenhouse gases set to bring about ‘largest temperature reduction ever achieved by single agreement'"

"Set to" means a future potential, not something that has already happened.
 
If it is either very expensive or very much degrades our quality of life for sure not, and probably not in any case. I say best evidence and experience has us spending the vast majority of our time and money on adjusting our lives along side of the earth. I would however set in place programs and maybe even laws to keep the populations of humans down, that will do more than anything else will to SAVE THE PLANET.

Right, so, shouldn't we take steps to reduce the fiddling we're doing right now? I mean, we don't understand the impact of the changes we're making, so perhaps we should make as little change as possible?
(obviously zero change isn't achievable because math)
 
"Set to" means a future potential, not something that has already happened.

HAHAH!! Yes, Deuce, they are making furture BS claims. That is what I said. You've finally caught up. Good job.
 
HAHAH!! Yes, Deuce, they are making furture BS claims. That is what I said. You've finally caught up. Good job.

That's not exactly what you said, now your statement is more clear. Thanks.
 
HAHAH!! Yes, Deuce, they are making furture BS claims. That is what I said. You've finally caught up. Good job.

It's amazing, but I think he's starting to understand!
 
It's amazing, but I think he's starting to understand!

Don't hold your breath. In a few years the treaty will be in tatters, there will be nothing quantifiable that is accomplished other than suffering, and Deuce and the rest of the true believers will excuse the failure on the basis of good intentions in trying to fix something that hasn't yet been proven to be a threat.
 
Don't hold your breath. In a few years the treaty will be in tatters, there will be nothing quantifiable that is accomplished other than suffering, and Deuce and the rest of the true believers will excuse the failure on the basis of good intentions in trying to fix something that hasn't yet been proven to be a threat.

I'm trying to not fiddle with dials you admit yourself we don't understand.
 
I'm trying to not fiddle with dials you admit yourself we don't understand.

No, you fully support fiddling with dials we don't understand.
 
Back
Top Bottom