• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Day length and ice melt


The map shows a clear gain in ice mass.

The area of pale blue is much larger thna the very strongly coloured red bits.
I agree it would not be simple, the losses were greater, but over a much smaller area,
while the areas of gain had smaller gains, but over a larger area.
It will be interesting to see what happens this winter, the knee of the lowest level of Arctic Sea Ice,
came early this year.
Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
It looks like about a week early!
 
Thing is I can look at a map and understand that it says something that is different to what the words say.

I'm clever like that.

Bit like having the confidence to work out the impact on day length that would have happened if the Greenland's losing ice story was true.

When you get loads of evidence that something is a lie from loads of different angles you know it's a lie.

I would say that you could not be as stupid as you seem on this part of the forum (you are a lot less blinkered on other subjects) but I have met lots of people who are much more stupid than you when they wish to be.

:lamo

Those scientists cant get anything over on you, boyo!
 
Back
Top Bottom