• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fighting global warming 'brett style.'

BrettNortje

BrettNortje

Banned
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
793
Reaction score
22
Location
Cape Town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
The world is ever changing climate wise, getting faster and faster as ozone is depleted. this ozone keeps us insulated against space, which has less pressure than under the layer. the less of the ozone layer there is, the lower the pressure goes, and, then we get temperature and climate extremes, like hotter summers and colder winters.

Of course, the best way to fight climate change is to replenish the ozone layer. this can be done by creating more ozone with electricity. so, i am suggesting launching big bombs of electrical discharge - not nukes, of course, as this would set fire to the ozone layer - but rather a electromagnetic pulse bomb, similar to the one i theorized in the military thread under weapons research.
 
BrettNortje said:
The world is ever changing climate wise, getting faster and faster as ozone is depleted. this ozone keeps us insulated against space, which has less pressure than under the layer. the less of the ozone layer there is, the lower the pressure goes, and, then we get temperature and climate extremes, like hotter summers and colder winters.

Of course, the best way to fight climate change is to replenish the ozone layer. this can be done by creating more ozone with electricity. so, i am suggesting launching big bombs of electrical discharge - not nukes, of course, as this would set fire to the ozone layer - but rather a electromagnetic pulse bomb, similar to the one i theorized in the military thread under weapons research.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure this should be moved to the CT forum
 
BrettNortje said:
The world is ever changing climate wise, getting faster and faster as ozone is depleted. this ozone keeps us insulated against space, which has less pressure than under the layer. the less of the ozone layer there is, the lower the pressure goes, and, then we get temperature and climate extremes, like hotter summers and colder winters.

Of course, the best way to fight climate change is to replenish the ozone layer. this can be done by creating more ozone with electricity. so, i am suggesting launching big bombs of electrical discharge - not nukes, of course, as this would set fire to the ozone layer - but rather a electromagnetic pulse bomb, similar to the one i theorized in the military thread under weapons research.
Click to expand...

Clearly you have no clue about the subject.

Ozone down here is a slight problem.

In the upper atmosphere, where we need it, there is lots of it. Any tiny amount we would add by such a process would be inconsequential.

Sunshine is adding ozone all the time.
 
BrettNortje said:
this ozone keeps us insulated against space,
Click to expand...
No it doesn't.


so, i am suggesting launching big bombs of electrical discharge - not nukes, of course, as this would set fire to the ozone layer
Click to expand...
No it wouldn't.-

but rather a electromagnetic pulse bomb, similar to the one i theorized in the military thread under weapons research.
Click to expand...
They don't exist outside of nukes.

You're wrong about everything you post about.
 
Last edited:
We simply cannot create enough power to generate any significant ozone. It is a chemical reaction in the high atmosphere cause by solar ultrovilot. Besides, the ozone layer protects from dangerous rays like UVC and higher. It couldn't possible add any significant atmospheric pressure.

Ozone Chapter 5
 
Mad fool posts drivel about solving GW. No science knowledge what so ever.

No alarmists come back at him, it's left to the resident skeptics to expalin the way the world works.

I wonder why?
 
Global warming is a myth, created by Ross Perot and Arnold Schwarzenegger, to scam the Jews out of social security funds, which will ultimately fund more terrorism. Open your eyes man!!
 
ScrewPokemonGo said:
Global warming is a myth, created by Ross Perot and Arnold Schwarzenegger, to scam the Jews out of social security funds, which will ultimately fund more terrorism. Open your eyes man!!
Click to expand...

Margret Thatcher used it before they were in politics.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Mad fool posts drivel about solving GW. No science knowledge what so ever.

No alarmists come back at him, it's left to the resident skeptics to expalin the way the world works.

I wonder why?
Click to expand...

You're right. No alarmists have come back at him.
 
Deuce said:
You're right. No alarmists have come back at him.
Click to expand...

It's the fact that it would require you to actually understand some science for yourself and not just quote somebody else that keeps them off I think.

I was on a Forum where the owner had a sock puppet which came in spouting denialist psudo-sceince crap. The only people to take him to task were the resident skeptics. He shortly there after closed the Forum despite it having advertisment on it.
 
Tim the plumber said:
It's the fact that it would require you to actually understand some science for yourself and not just quote somebody else that keeps them off I think.

I was on a Forum where the owner had a sock puppet which came in spouting denialist psudo-sceince crap. The only people to take him to task were the resident skeptics. He shortly there after closed the Forum despite it having advertisment on it.
Click to expand...

petty personal attacks, not surprising from your kind. It's much easier than reading the thread carefully.
 
Deuce said:
petty personal attacks, not surprising from your kind. It's much easier than reading the thread carefully.
Click to expand...

I thought i was on the same side as you.

I thought my post was clear in that it would require people (I use you as in one as in people) to understand basic science.

It was on the basics of science that the sock puppet was taken to task by 2 skeptics of which I was one.

I think you have mis-read this thread a bit. Easy to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom