• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Season Approaches: U.S. Hits Record 127 Months Since Major Hurricane Strike

Except for, you know, all those published studies.

[emoji849]
As of yet the vast majority of the studies are not evidence based, but are simulations.
They use their assumptions and best guesses, to try and project the future.
The error bar itself on most of the studies, should tell anyone who cares to look, how sure they are of their answers.
 
When I was in middle school they taught that nature occurs in cycles. When I learned to sail I learned the ocean, waves and tides occur in cycles, or patterns. We also learned that the seventh wave is the biggest, the first the smallest and a big wave out of that sequence is called a "rogue wave".

This fact of so few hurricanes if any hardly at all and mild at that proves one thing for sure. Hurricanes occur in patterns.

Sure, but obviously the experts think the pattern is unusual.
 
The numbers for ALL studies start with 'ifs'.

You just cherry pick the ones you want to believe.
Yes, the IPCC and pundits are experts at cherry picking.

I see you aren't willing to show us an example.

That's OK, we all know you are irrelevant for an honest debate.
 
Sure, but obviously the experts think the pattern is unusual.

The experts think they are unusual, or is it the pundits spinning the experts works?
 
Back
Top Bottom