• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Watts Up With That, aka, LOLWUWT and WTFUWT

Lord of Planar said:
Really?

Most the links I have ever been refereed to have no authors name for the writing.
Click to expand...

Just about every single post is credited to an author. And they are listed on a pretty easily found 'contributors' page.

They're all working scientists- and generally when they publish their work, they review it in context on the site.

But you like WUWT, who's articles are written by guys like 'Bob Tisdale' who's only credential is that he's an 'independent climate researcher' (i.e. not an actual climate researcher).

Seems like with all your whining about 'pundits', that you'd want to know what the actual scientists say (since you clearly have no interaction with any).
 
LowDown said:
People do get banned for being nasty and repeatedly violating policy. At RealClimate all that is needed for banning is a dissenting opinion no matter how nicely and respectfully stated.

Go to WUWT and you will find plenty of dissent. Now go find me dissent at RealClimate.
Click to expand...

Well said and accurate.
 
LowDown said:
The opinion of a fool isn't worth much.

There hasn't been much criticism of the science posted at WUWT. Not the vast majority of it. Scientific reviews and contributions there are extensively commented on by alarmists and skeptics alike. The issues are well aired out in what is mostly a well informed manner. Your characterization of it can only be called a lie.
Click to expand...

Watt a foolish deluded post. Much like those on WUWT.
 
Jack Hays said:
As you wish. I see your thread as an opportunity. Thanks.
Click to expand...
;-)
You see the whole board as "an opportunity"/GRAFFITI WALL to dump links in.
About 16 links in 20 posts here. Many, as usual, not even commented by you.
And it's working great for you isn't it! People are no doubt looking for your blog trash in the interim pages. No they aren't.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Nothing intelligent to say?

Typical...
Click to expand...

Think the intelligence of someone who takes WUWT as gospel then accuses other people of believing everything they read on the internet speaks for itself. :lamo
 
Nilly said:
Think the intelligence of someone who takes WUWT as gospel then accuses other people of believing everything they read on the internet speaks for itself. :lamo
Click to expand...

I never take any blog as gospel. I will search for the source and read it.
 
Lord of Planar said:
I never take any blog as gospel. I will search for the source and read it.
Click to expand...

Then you'll know that WUWT is a bunch of trash, cherry picking small individual artifacts as evidence against AGW as a whole whilst ignoring the vast amount of evidence for it.
 
mbig said:
;-)
You see the whole board as "an opportunity"/GRAFFITI WALL to dump links in.
About 16 links in 20 posts here. Many, as usual, not even commented by you.
And it's working great for you isn't it! People are no doubt looking for your blog trash in the interim pages. No they aren't.
Click to expand...

I provide data. You provide insults. I like my chances.
 
Nilly said:
Then you'll know that WUWT is a bunch of trash, cherry picking small individual artifacts as evidence against AGW as a whole whilst ignoring the vast amount of evidence for it.
Click to expand...
Believe as you wish.
 
Jack Hays said:
I provide data. You provide insults. I like my chances.
Click to expand...
You "provide"/SPAM up blogs with no conversant other content... ever. Thx for the bump.
 
mbig said:
You "provide"/SPAM up blogs with no conversant other content... ever. Thx for the bump.
Click to expand...
Jack Hays said:
Another false claim.
Click to expand...
This section Includes Hundreds (Thousands actually) of more examples that what I say is true.
Even Your denial above is empty, non-specific, non-refuting, and the always... NONconversant.
 
Last edited:
mbig said:
This section Includes Hundreds (Thousands actually) of more examples that what I say is true.
Even Your denial above is empty, non-specific, non-refuting, and the always... NONconversant.
Click to expand...

I reply to comments worthy of reply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom