For you a liberal is synonym for (deadly) idiot? One funny thing about liberals, they take science more often seriously compared to conservative people. By counting liberals as idiots you also - most likely - don't trust scientific research and new findings about how the universe works. Most fun thing about your comments is that "trade mark" question: "Do you get this now??". It's not even remotely intellectual, just stupid tautology from you.
It seems to depend on what the science in question has to say. For deeply religious conservatives, research on evolutionary biology and archeological evidence on an entire host of issues tend to conflict with some of their beliefs. For conservatives who lean towards individual liberties, there is also some tension between their desire to extend people the liberty to make their own choice and just about any strand of research that would justify centralized action plans.
However, we also have radicals on the left who really believe gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and biological sex are independent of one another. You can check for yourself, but it's somewhere in the vicinity of 95% of biological males and females who identify with their respective biological gender. A quick eye sweep anywhere in North America or Europe will tell you the vast majority of them also dress, choose haircuts, etc. in accordance with the prevailing social norms associated with their biological genders and just about 10% of them are homosexuals or bisexuals. Those are insanely strong correlations. A model with all of these aspects of human psychology independent is about as strongly rejected by data as you could ever hope a model to be rejected. Yet, radicals on the left believe it is a correct view. They also believe in equally shockingly uninformed nonsense such as that the psychology of men and women is identical. In this case, you have several studies conducted by psychologists who, if anything, are biased in favor of finding that men and women are identical, and these studies show it's not true. One of them covers over 130 000 people in 55 countries. Last time I heard Jordan Peterson commenting on this issue, he counted 6 major studies published in top journals containing massive empirical evidence on the personality differences between men and women, all of them identifying the same general patterns.
An engineer at Google got fired over an internal memo which explained, using carefully selected peer-reviewed research, that men and women are not identical. Summers got fired from Harvard when he pointed out more geniuses are men, in a discussion on why STEM fields are not welcoming more women. The IQ distribution is more dispersed for men than for women, so that is just an empirical fact: even if they're very similar on average, if you go the tails of the distribution, you will find those groups are almost only composed of men. Denying that is as stupid as believing the Earth is flat.
Conservatives do not have a monopoly on stupidity. We're all human beings with the same underlying cognitive structures, albeit with some individual variations. The only constant pattern here is that people tend to find reasons to disagree with inconvenient ideas. You only get them to be reasonable when they have to defend their views to a crowd whom they expect to influence their reputation based on the empirical accuracy of their statements. That happens in some fields of research during seminars, assuming the field is not politically biased. The reason is that your capacity to reason is something you use to manage your reputation, not something you use to find the truth (Jonathan Haidt, "The Righteous Mind").
