- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 9,594
- Reaction score
- 2,072
- Location
- France
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I think you make a good point. And America liberals should be wary of demonizing capitalism, both in playing into the hand of Republican propaganda, and because as you point out, it's misguided.
Yes, given the fact that if we want to do away with "capitalism" we have to return to the preceding method of exchange, which was "barter"!
Capitalism is outrageous only when Income Taxation is too low - what happens is the ogre of significant Income Disparity. Which is not just a Gini Coefficient calculation, but the misery of those incarcerated there. (And in the US that population is around 40 million individuals living an existence below the Poverty Threshold.)
No society in which people care for one another should such misery be allowed.
To function well, the more you remove the restraints on capitalism (which is not necessarily good or bad), the more you need progressive taxation. They go hand in hand, and if done properly. This frees up business dramatically (capitalism) This creates a sort of class division between those that pay the bulk of the taxes, and those that don't
Agreed - I could not have put it better myself!
Wealth is derived from levels of Income Taxation that allow significant amounts of value (money) to go only to those motivated to earn such aberrant sums. By lowering upper-income taxation, we incentivize people to pursue immense Wealth.
Some cannot see that bad in that. Such Immense Wealth is undeserved and should be taxed and returned to those who were the means of generating it. Americans deserve and need a National Healthcare System and Very low-cost Postsecondary Education. (This lack of Tertiary Education being the prime reason people are born into poverty and remain there!)
Any such monstrously large wealth is undeserved in a nation where, because of a lack of sufficient taxation, significant Income Disparity is the consequence. It should be the first purpose of any society to suppress Income Disparity.
We cannot all earn the same salary - Communism has taught us the futility of such nonsense. But neither does any society need the monstrous Income Disparity that is the mistake being made in the US today!
But if government taxes sufficiently the high end of that capitalistic wealth, and re-invests it reasonable well back in the general population (which is primarily lower/middle class), then it can function well (despite the class warfare). This offsets the wild disparity you have in terms of who gains from corporate activity (the wealthiest individuals/shareholders).
Yes, that consequence becomes inevitable. Some call that "The Management of Capitalism", which is something our nation has yet to learn. Because we are still on a mindless bent propelled by the notion that, as regards Wealth, "whatever the amount one has, more of it is always better!"
Which is colossal stoopidity given the observable lifetime penury at the bottom of the societal-scale that exists today.
When Republicans are successful in pushing that progressivity down, as we saw in the recent Trump tax cuts, it's just gong to get further out of balance.
Donald Dork is/was simply returning a favor to those who supplied him the funds to get elected. He was thinking of his own reelection in two years time. I doubt anything can be done about the nation's evil Income Disparity for as long as we maintain the existing manipulations of the present electoral system.
Both gerrymandering and the Electoral College have been around since 1812. Many people (on this forum) cannot see the inveterate dishonesty of someone who loses the popular-vote becoming PotUS.
People got used to them, and many think wrongly that they are wholly "THE AMERICAN WAY".
Ignorance is bliss ...