Balance of trade understated effects upon their nation's domestic production.

James972 said:

Certificates or tariffs are identical taxes on American consumers that protect and cripple our economy. ...

Click to expand...

James972, I will not nit-pick by further discussing if the Import Certificate policy's a fee for a privelege, or a tax. However, those additional costs paid by USA purchasers of imported goods would entirely remedy what now is the consequential economic harm due to their aggregate purchasing decisions.
Annual trade deficits are always net detrimental to their nations' GDPs and drag upon their numbers of jobs more than otherwise.

To the extent tha USA purchasers' additional costs exceed the federal expenditures due to the policy, those market-determined costs serve as an indirect but effective price subsidy of USA's exported goods.
You're unable to understand the policy would be to our nation's net economic and social well-being because you cannot abide reductions of any foreign goods' price advantages.
Respectfully, Supposn

James972 said:

Certificates or tariffs are identical taxes on American consumers that protect and cripple our economy

USA producers are hindered by idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc. Conservatives would eliminate those problems to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our competitiveness. Do you understand?

Click to expand...

You want your trade surpluses reduced? This is second time I've seen you say that. Odd thing to say.
You don't espouse conservative values. If you really believe what you post here, youre a neoliberal.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

James972 said:

... USA producers are hindered by idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc. Conservatives would eliminate those problems to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our competitiveness. Do you understand?

Click to expand...

James972, I understand this:
Due to laws and regulations that favor the more wealthy and effectively shift greater burdens upon many others,

our nation's economic and social well being is reduced.​

[SUB][/SUB]
USA laws and regulations that do not promote increases of our nation's GDP, or numbers of jobs, or median wage, but intentionally or unintentionally reduce wage earners' security, opportunities, reduce our nation's economic and social well being.

Substantially increasing and retaining our federal minimum wage rate's purchasing power, our adopting the trade policy described with Wikipedia's Import Certificates article, establishing federal entitlement of single payer basic medical insurance, repealing our federal laws hindering labor organizations to function, reducing wealth's ability to purchase our political elections would all contribute to improving our nation's economic and social well being.

Extents of any improvements to our educational and training systems would be reflected by no lesser improved extents of our nation's economic and social well being.

You and I understand too often we do not agree upon facts and when we do agree upon some facts, we often draw opposing conclusions from them.
Respectfully, Supposn

I'm Supposn said:

USA laws and regulations that do not promote increases of our nation's GDP, or numbers of jobs, or median wage, but intentionally or unintentionally reduce wage earners' security, opportunities, reduce our nation's economic and social well being.

Click to expand...

...so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

James972 said:

...so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

Click to expand...

James972, when your posts refer to conservatives, our discussions has gone beyond this topic of trade balances' relationships to their nations' GDP. We're essentially discussing the Republican Party and their allies.
I've responded to your post within the discussion thread of “Where are the Republicans going?”
https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-p.../335304-republicans-going.html#post1069209183
Respectfully, Supposn

I'm Supposn said:

James972, when your posts refer to conservatives, our discussions has gone beyond this topic of trade balances' relationships to their nations' GDP. We're essentially discussing the Republican Party and their allies.
I've responded to your post within the discussion thread of “Where are the Republicans going?”
https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-p.../335304-republicans-going.html#post1069209183
Respectfully, Supposn

Click to expand...

for 4th time:
..so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

James972 said:

for 4th time:
..so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

Click to expand...

James972, refer to “Where are the Republicans going?”, post #5 of
/www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/335304-republicans-going.html#post1069215810

The Republican's revenue-neutral tax-cuts? The Republican's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed in December, 2017.
I suppose you do understand but cannot abide.
Respectfully, Supposn

I'm Supposn said:

James972, refer to “Where are the Republicans going?”, post #5 of
/www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/335304-republicans-going.html#post1069215810

The Republican's revenue-neutral tax-cuts? The Republican's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed in December, 2017.
I suppose you do understand but cannot abide.
Respectfully, Supposn

Click to expand...

for 5th time:
..so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

James972 said:

for 5th time:
..so then you support eliminating idiotic liberal programs: taxes, unions, regulations, trade deals, budget deficits, and expensive liberal health care etc?? Conservatives would eliminate those idiotic programs to reduce our trade surpluses and greatly enhance our economy! Do you understand?

Click to expand...

James97, you may refer to “Where are the Republicans going?”, post #3 of
/www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/335304-republicans-going.html#post1069215810. I don't expect you can tolerate the truth regarding "Republicans and the Affordable Care Act, (ACA)".
Respectfully, Supposn

I'm Supposn said:

I don't expect you can tolerate the truth regarding "Republicans and the Affordable Care Act, (ACA)".

Click to expand...

Republicans oppose Obamacommiecare since it is socialist/communist and would rather employ capitalism to reduce prices 80% and add 10-20 years to our life expectancies.