• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why the Trade Deficit Matters

VAT is one of the ways to prevent too much buying and hence lower the trade deficit.

we value freedom here, we don't want Nazi elites telling us how much to buy. Trade deficit is caused when you make junk that people don't want to buy. the way to fix it is to make good stuff like the Germans do, and prevent Nazi govt from interfering.
 
So what is it when a handful of people own most of the wealth?
.

its usually called socialism. Under capitalism Steve Jobs cant have $15 billion unless he distributes $100 billion in phones. Capitalism is amazing that way.
 
Yes.. or when you buy too many foreign products.

you never buy too many foreign products!!!! people buy as long as it improves their standard of living, and Nazi govt should not interfere!!
 
Annual trade deficits indicate the nation has consumed more products than it has produced. The amount of a nation's net trade balance can only account for the prices of globally traded products effects upon their nations' GDP, but products' prices do not reflect all of the commercial activity their production has generated.

There are enterprises in industries that we would suppose our unrelated, but they generate commercial activity between them. (e.g. a coffee shop or a pizza parlor near a producer of goods, or a cartoonist that that provides content for that producer's in-house posters or company bulletins are two of many examples. All production supporting or other commercial activity induced by production, are not reflected within the prices of those products. Of course all domestic commercial production activity contributes to their nation's GDP but if it's not reflected within the prices of globally traded products, we cannot account for the ALL of global trades' net effects upon domestic production due to the nation's net balance of international trade; but it's always to a greater extent than the net balance itself.

Costs that contribute to their nations' domestic production, but are not fully paid for by the favored producers, and are not reflected in those producers' prices. To the extent that prices of globally traded goods are understated, they understate international trades' effects upon their nation's domestic production reflected by the annual GDP.

Similar to the iceberg that sank the Titanic, the great proportion of trade deficits' economic threat is hidden and its additional size cannot be approximated.

Respectfully, Supposn
 
Annual trade deficits indicate the nation has consumed more products than it has produced. The amount of a nation's net trade balance can only account for the prices of globally traded products effects upon their nations' GDP, but products' prices do not reflect all of the commercial activity their production has generated.

it seems you and Trump care about deficits more than anyone! Do you love him?
 
it seems you and Trump care about deficits more than anyone! Do you love him?
James972, No. I'm among the proponents of the improved trade policy concept as described in Wikipedia's “Import Certificates” article.
It's superior to free trade, tariffs, or any other trade policy we're aware of.

Google Wikipedia's article entitled “Import Certificates”.
Respectfully, Supposn
 
There is a lot of disagreement about the severity of the problem and the potential consequences:
The current pattern of international capital flows—should it persist—could prove counterproductive.


We can run huge deficits for the time being, because foreigners— in particular, foreign governments— are willing to lend us huge sums. But one of these days the easy credit will come to an end, and the
United States will have to start paying its way in the world economy.


My view is that the trade deficit is not a problem in itself but is a symptom of a problem. The problem is low national saving. Given that national saving is low, I am not eager for the trade deficit to disappear, because that would mean that domestic investment would need to fall to the low level of national saving. But I do think it would be good if the trade deficit were to disappear accompanied by an increase in national saving.


In addition to taking a look at a textbook on macroeconomics or international economics, here are some suggestions for sources of information about the topic:


 
There is a lot of disagreement about the severity of the problem and the potential consequences:
The current pattern of international capital flows—should it persist—could prove counterproductive.


We can run huge deficits for the time being, because foreigners— in particular, foreign governments— are willing to lend us huge sums. But one of these days the easy credit will come to an end, and the
United States will have to start paying its way in the world economy.


My view is that the trade deficit is not a problem in itself but is a symptom of a problem. The problem is low national saving. Given that national saving is low, I am not eager for the trade deficit to disappear, because that would mean that domestic investment would need to fall to the low level of national saving. But I do think it would be good if the trade deficit were to disappear accompanied by an increase in national saving.


In addition to taking a look at a textbook on macroeconomics or international economics, here are some suggestions for sources of information about the topic:



what on earth is your point?? Do you have any idea?
 
Back
Top Bottom