• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Without governments, would countries have more inequality, or less

The problem for living together in societies is to find the most efficient set of property rights to maximize general welfare.

it isn't a problem at all. private property is not communal. nor does it have anything to do with the general welfare.
do you actually have a point or just more platitudes?

also the general welfare has nothing to do with private property. it is a charge of government not the individual.
 
I suspect you have never checked the distribution of income and Gini for the Eu, have you. Or compared the average incomes across the continent with the poverty line in say Germany? Or the poverty line in Bavaria with the average income in Mecklenburg?

You are just tying to seed discontent by spreading selective and so false information.

I have, and I have posted it here many a time:
720px-Gini_since_WWII.svg.png


Or compared the average incomes across the continent with the poverty line in say Germany? Or the poverty line in Bavaria with the average income in Mecklenburg?

No, I have never done the above. And I am not about to do it either.

The comparison between the Gini Coefficient and average incomes is irrelevant. The Gini is already devised from income statistics and employed to show Income Disparity (as in the chart above) ...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom