BrettNortje
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 793
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Cape Town
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
All countries have money through taxation, something they can rely on. this is basically the only way they make money, and the temptation to raise taxes remains strong. if they were to look for alternative methods to generate funds, they would be much better off, and that is what this is about. i hear some of you with very simple methods to generate funds, things that require all the capital and generate something meager like fifteen percent over a year, of course. i am here to show you a new way to generate funds easily and quickly, in vast sums, of course.
So, what is my bright idea this time? if we were to observe that the state has money, more than a billion in hand from country to country, at least, there is a lot you can do with a billion. this billion can generate much funding - i am working with a billion, not two hundred times as much, so far.
[1] If the state wants to see the money grow, they could observe that scarcity equals more value. if they were to buy their money back off the market, they would have lost nothing, as they still have the cash in hand. then the currency will grow in strength, and, there will be a cash shortage for the country. this will mean the private sector will find it hard to operate due to lack of money for all customers, and they will need to borrow from the bank to get more for themselves too. some businesses will fold and these will be sold to other bigger private sector entities and then the market will be stimulated with more money. let's make this more structured?
Money, is bought with money. this means it travels from the hands of the people into the hands of the state. this means less money is available, and, the banks need to borrow from the state to let the private sector borrow from them, of course. seeing as how banks do so well each year, this is no problem to them, and the link is there.
[2] If the state was to run 'a state insurance' regarding marriage, then they could make sure both parties are looked after in these cases. this would be where each month the couple is married they need to pay a insurance fee. of course, most people remain married, so do not need this insurance, and, it will help fund the court matters that the women cannot afford often.
So, what is my bright idea this time? if we were to observe that the state has money, more than a billion in hand from country to country, at least, there is a lot you can do with a billion. this billion can generate much funding - i am working with a billion, not two hundred times as much, so far.
[1] If the state wants to see the money grow, they could observe that scarcity equals more value. if they were to buy their money back off the market, they would have lost nothing, as they still have the cash in hand. then the currency will grow in strength, and, there will be a cash shortage for the country. this will mean the private sector will find it hard to operate due to lack of money for all customers, and they will need to borrow from the bank to get more for themselves too. some businesses will fold and these will be sold to other bigger private sector entities and then the market will be stimulated with more money. let's make this more structured?
Money, is bought with money. this means it travels from the hands of the people into the hands of the state. this means less money is available, and, the banks need to borrow from the state to let the private sector borrow from them, of course. seeing as how banks do so well each year, this is no problem to them, and the link is there.
[2] If the state was to run 'a state insurance' regarding marriage, then they could make sure both parties are looked after in these cases. this would be where each month the couple is married they need to pay a insurance fee. of course, most people remain married, so do not need this insurance, and, it will help fund the court matters that the women cannot afford often.