RGacky3
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 8, 2012
- Messages
- 9,570
- Reaction score
- 1,493
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
I understand you believe it to be a fallacy, just as others believe that it is a fallacy to think that property is NOT a natural right. When one starts with different premises, one will reach different conclusions.
Which is why I made a bunch of arguments to say it is NOT a natural right.
Yes, I understand that you don't believe that property is a natural right. Obviously, that is your belief and there's nothing I can do to change your fundamental premises that lead you to this conclusion. So I have come to realize that there's really no point in continuing to argue the point.
However, while your beliefs don't impact my life, the law does. So my primary concern is what sorts of legislation you propose and support based upon your belief that people have no natural right to property.
The conclusions I come to could be different dispite not believing property is a natural right, if I was convinced that capitalism was the best way to organize society then I'd switch over ... has nothing to do with property being a natural right, I've just never been convinced of that.
Again, you are certainly free to hold whatever opinions your wish regarding property rights. You have laid out your argument and I have done likewise. Neither of us has convinced the other. Therefore, my only concern now is what action you intend to undertake that will effect me and my property.
I don't think you've argued that property rights are a natural right ... only that they are traditional.