Moderators are not willing to read through all these messages to decide was does and doesn't break the rules. However, the delegates could set rules by which visitors (not voting delegates) and delegates could be requested to be removed from this Convention Sub-Forum (banned from the Convention). The THREE officers (President, VP and Secretary) would have to vote among themselves to have someone banned from the Convention and if so, they could request forum staff to sub-forum ban that member. It would be up to forum staff, of course, whether or not to agree to this proposition.
The alternative is this Convention becomes more a flame fest than the basement. It also means extreme racist, Nazi or just extremely hateful insults would be allowed. Remember, anyone whether or not a delegate can post and no way to stop it even if they're doing so to try to derail the Convention.
So, this is the poll and it is yes or no.
Yes: it should be a rule of the Constitutional Convention that, if after one or more warning by Convention officers, a person posting on the forum continues to seriously flame, bait or troll other members, the 3 officers as a panel may request forum staff to ban that member from the Convention sub-forum.
No: There will be no prohibition against anyone seriously flaming, baiting, stalking and trolling Constitutional Convention threads.
Folks, make your comments but this is a yes or no vote. Lack of a yes means there will be no rules against personal insults, trolling, flaming, baiting or attempting to derail threads or the Convention by anyone - delegate or not.