• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Coronavirus Deaths Per Capita in June by Country

S

slates

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
77
Reaction score
20
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed


Looks like things are getting worse in South America..
 
swing_voter said:
Something wrong with that graph.

It says America has 36 deaths per million population.

On Coronavirus Update (Live): 10,660,132 Cases and 515,765 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer the number is 394 deaths per million, which is over 10 times more.
Click to expand...



It's 393 per 1M pop, about the same rank., regardless per cap.

Coronavirus Update (Live): 10,681,590 Cases and 516,297 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer

Looks like the OP should read: "Things are getting worse in America, South America, and elsewhere".

THAT'S the truth. Them's the facts. Why single out SA?
 
swing_voter said:
Something wrong with that graph.

It says America has 36 deaths per million population.

On Coronavirus Update (Live): 10,660,132 Cases and 515,765 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer the number is 394 deaths per million, which is over 10 times more.
Click to expand...
I agree that something is wrong with the graph, The June 1 graph says 3 deaths per million, while the June 30 graph says 68.8 deaths per million,
I suspect the graph is only based on June cumulative death, but cannot think of a way to verify that.
 
longview said:
I agree that something is wrong with the graph, The June 1 graph says 3 deaths per million, while the June 30 graph says 68.8 deaths per million,
I suspect the graph is only based on June cumulative death, but cannot think of a way to verify that.
Click to expand...

The graph does not include Brazil, and weeks ago they were dying like flies in those favelas.

Misinformation drives the Covid Apocalypse. Most of the herd is still in stampede, but more and more are beginning to realize the scam and pulling over and pulling off the mask.
 
Thoreau72 said:
The graph does not include Brazil, and weeks ago they were dying like flies in those favelas.

Misinformation drives the Covid Apocalypse. Most of the herd is still in stampede, but more and more are beginning to realize the scam and pulling over and pulling off the mask.
Click to expand...
Brazil was at the top of the list, I just don't know how they arrived at the number they are using.
While I think some of the responses were unnecessary, Covid-19 is very real, and quite contagious.
The question if it is more dangerous than the seasonal flu, but more contagious, remains open.
 
longview said:
Brazil was at the top of the list, I just don't know how they arrived at the number they are using.
While I think some of the responses were unnecessary, Covid-19 is very real, and quite contagious.
The question if it is more dangerous than the seasonal flu, but more contagious, remains open.
Click to expand...

I agree it is contagious, but it appears its morbidity rate is very low indeed.

If the germ was spread in big cities by mercenary spreaders, that would really effect the measure of how contagious it is.
 
Thoreau72 said:
I agree it is contagious, but it appears its morbidity rate is very low indeed.

If the germ was spread in big cities by mercenary spreaders, that would really effect the measure of how contagious it is.
Click to expand...
While I would think nothing is out of scope for the modern democrat party, I think Covid-19 is spreading organically.
 
longview said:
While I would think nothing is out of scope for the modern democrat party, I think Covid-19 is spreading organically.
Click to expand...

It is spreading organically, but it's highly likely it was begun by being spread by mercenary individuals, and I cannot help but think that this "second wave" is being delivered to some degree the same way, even though it is simple math that more testing = more cases discovered.

A greater number of cases discovered and a simultaneous decline in deaths seems odd, but here is something you might be interested in reading about the death rates.

Murder by Lockdown: Details From a Dozen Countries - LewRockwell

If you read it, I would be most interested in your thoughts about it.
 
Thoreau72 said:
It is spreading organically, but it's highly likely it was begun by being spread by mercenary individuals, and I cannot help but think that this "second wave" is being delivered to some degree the same way, even though it is simple math that more testing = more cases discovered.

A greater number of cases discovered and a simultaneous decline in deaths seems odd, but here is something you might be interested in reading about the death rates.

Murder by Lockdown: Details From a Dozen Countries - LewRockwell

If you read it, I would be most interested in your thoughts about it.
Click to expand...

A little too much CT for my taste, the phrase correlation is not causation, comes to mind.
I suspect that some in Governments and not displeased with the ranks of those drawing pensions are thinned, but I do not think it was planned.
 
This is the numbers for ONLY JUNE. In case people are comparing it to sites like worldmeter, which are cumulative
 
Thoreau72 said:
It is spreading organically, but it's highly likely it was begun by being spread by mercenary individuals, and I cannot help but think that this "second wave" is being delivered to some degree the same way, even though it is simple math that more testing = more cases discovered.

A greater number of cases discovered and a simultaneous decline in deaths seems odd, but here is something you might be interested in reading about the death rates.

Murder by Lockdown: Details From a Dozen Countries - LewRockwell

If you read it, I would be most interested in your thoughts about it.
Click to expand...


Mercenary spreaders in the US and Europe or just the US?
 
longview said:
A little too much CT for my taste, the phrase correlation is not causation, comes to mind.
I suspect that some in Governments and not displeased with the ranks of those drawing pensions are thinned, but I do not think it was planned.
Click to expand...


I expect the cost of Covid 19 towards the economy is far greater than any money saved from pensions and or care for the elderly
 
longview said:
A little too much CT for my taste, the phrase correlation is not causation, comes to mind.
I suspect that some in Governments and not displeased with the ranks of those drawing pensions are thinned, but I do not think it was planned.
Click to expand...

Thanks for replying.

The article does not suggest it was planned, and I did not mean to imply that the article supported the idea that it was planned.

IMO the point of the article was that the lockdown strategy was counterproductive, it did not work as intended.

That so many governments imposed the lockdown almost simultaneously might suggest it was a conspiracy by governments, but I see that part as being mere coincidence.

The most relevant facts supporting the idea of Plandemic are the experiments for Gain of Function in 2015, the involvement of Fauci in bending the rules for funding to Wuhan lab, and Fauci's statement in 2017 that this administration will face an epidemic.

The larger point is that the lockdown brought the deaths of old infirm people suddenly made isolated.

As James Madison noted, men holding power OUGHT to be mistrusted.
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
Mercenary spreaders in the US and Europe or just the US?
Click to expand...

Considering the targets and certain circumstantial evidence, China, Iran, the US and probably elsewhere.
 
slates said:


Looks like things are getting worse in South America..
Click to expand...


The graph is not referenced. Neither does it say whether the data is for the month of June, 2020 or the total data through June, 2020. The US value of 15.6, if per 100,000 population, would be 51,636 deaths. My data gives a June 2020 figure of 23,196.

Something is not right here, folks. Caveat emptor.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

Sent from my old PC, using a cheap keyboard.
 
Torus34 said:
The graph is not referenced. Neither does it say whether the data is for the month of June, 2020 or the total data through June, 2020. The US value of 15.6, if per 100,000 population, would be 51,636 deaths. My data gives a June 2020 figure of 23,196.

Something is not right here, folks. Caveat emptor.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

Sent from my old PC, using a cheap keyboard.
Click to expand...

I think the fact that it starts from 0 at June should answer your question. Also if you watch the full video the US has 68.8 per MILLION btw by the end which lines up 23000 number.

Caveat emptor to your post.
 
slates said:
I think the fact that it starts from 0 at June should answer your question. Also if you watch the full video the US has 68.8 per MILLION btw by the end which lines up 23000 number.

Caveat emptor to your post.
Click to expand...

Hi! Sorry 'bout that. I rarely have time to watch a video. They can be very time-inefficient for learning new things.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

Sent from my old PC, using a cheap keyboard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom