- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,556
- Reaction score
- 28,921
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Hydroxychloroquine. It’s over.
I read the entire paper.
And I don’t assume false data when reading a peer reviewed Lancet paper, I tend to take this stuff at face value because I don’t have a wingnut bias.
If these accusations of false data are true, the Lancet will have a black eye, and the authors academic careers will be seriously damaged.
A mysterious company’s coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling | Science | AAAS
Huh, not as over as the OP would have you believe.
But don't blame him, he doesn't read the papers that he chooses to believe....
I read the entire paper.
And I don’t assume false data when reading a peer reviewed Lancet paper, I tend to take this stuff at face value because I don’t have a wingnut bias.
If these accusations of false data are true, the Lancet will have a black eye, and the authors academic careers will be seriously damaged.