- Joined
- Nov 25, 2019
- Messages
- 69,060
- Reaction score
- 16,351
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes, so? I dont think you even understand the 2nd one you posted. It means that the necessary protein expected to confer immunity isnt present and those patients are at higher risk of re-infection. :lol:
And link 1 still says unlikely. Since there are some cases that do appear to be re-infections...what is your point?
I wrote it's still unknown....so again...what is your point?
No, there are plenty of people that misguidedly believe as you've written.
We develop an immunity when they develop a vaccine to vaccinate people. Or we may not develop immunity.
Some people have gotten re-infected after having it. They dont know for sure if having it confers immunity and if it does, for how long. For SARS it's only for 2-3 yrs.
and how do you protect all the at-risk people then? The elderly, the persons with suppressed immune systems, etc? Do you just let them die?
No evidence of the bolded above in your link, which is what I was looking for. No evidence anyone that gets THIS virus will or can get the SAME virus again.