• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Should Public Sector Workers Get A Stimulus Check?

Luther

Another California Refugee
DP Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
20,649
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?
 
Why are you not complaining about big business getting money? Boeing, millions, no problem. Some poor slob getting a few thousand, big problem.

Keep voting republican and supporting the top ten percent and ignore the part that says by the people, for the people.
 
They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?

From a practical perspective: Because the longer it takes government bureaucracy to determine whether or not someone is truly "deserving" of the funds, the longer it takes for money to get to the people who actually need it. Everyone should get a check whether they need it or not, because I would argue far more people need it than who don't. And for the people who do not need the checks, they can simply spend it within the consumer economy to get money circulating into the system.
 
They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?


Why post an OP that is only in question form that you won't answer yourself? Or, what are your thoughts?
 
They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?

If anything I'd say we need more stash of cash..
 
Why are you not complaining about big business getting money? Boeing, millions, no problem. Some poor slob getting a few thousand, big problem.

Keep voting republican and supporting the top ten percent and ignore the part that says by the people, for the people.


Talk radio right wing wingers never do that!

The man in their AM radio works for Wall Street and big oil.
 
They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?

Because government employees are constantly making the supreme sacrifice in serving the needs of the helpless, ignorant and abused masses. Without government employees we would wander around aimlessly, bumping into each other and transmitting CV-19.
 
Why are you not complaining about big business getting money? Boeing, millions, no problem. Some poor slob getting a few thousand, big problem.

Keep voting republican and supporting the top ten percent and ignore the part that says by the people, for the people.

Why not? Public workers live off the tat of the private sector workers anyway. Let's give them even MORE money for not working.
 
From a practical perspective: Because the longer it takes government bureaucracy to determine whether or not someone is truly "deserving" of the funds, the longer it takes for money to get to the people who actually need it. Everyone should get a check whether they need it or not, because I would argue far more people need it than who don't. And for the people who do not need the checks, they can simply spend it within the consumer economy to get money circulating into the system.

It's tax season. Instead of sending checks to everyone how about just letting them keep their money and not requiring sending in anything?
 
We have an anguished opinion about government workers and no substantiated evidence.
 
It's tax season. Instead of sending checks to everyone how about just letting them keep their money and not requiring sending in anything?

Well, most people's income taxes are already paid via their employers through payroll taxes. If they could be given back through a full refund, that might suffice.
 
Why are you not complaining about big business getting money? Boeing, millions, no problem. Some poor slob getting a few thousand, big problem.

Keep voting republican and supporting the top ten percent and ignore the part that says by the people, for the people.

Why are you not complaining about big business getting money?




How does this ^ address this v?


They're being paid whether they work or not now

Should it not be just the people/businesses in private sector who cannot work?

Should the private sector get a stimulus check if they collect unemployment?
 
From a practical perspective: Because the longer it takes government bureaucracy to determine whether or not someone is truly "deserving" of the funds, the longer it takes for money to get to the people who actually need it. Everyone should get a check whether they need it or not, because I would argue far more people need it than who don't. And for the people who do not need the checks, they can simply spend it within the consumer economy to get money circulating into the system.

Everyone should get a check whether they need it or not,

And you're a conservative?!

Man, conservatism has sure changed?(LOL)
 
Why post an OP that is only in question form that you won't answer yourself? Or, what are your thoughts?

Oh, I will as we go along

You can count on it!!!!

But thanks for avoiding the question(LOL)

You did a good job
 
From a practical perspective: Because the longer it takes government bureaucracy to determine whether or not someone is truly "deserving" of the funds, the longer it takes for money to get to the people who actually need it. Everyone should get a check whether they need it or not, because I would argue far more people need it than who don't. And for the people who do not need the checks, they can simply spend it within the consumer economy to get money circulating into the system.

Just to let you know, I'm buying a $1,200 axle for my R.V.(Recreational vehicle) with my $1,200 check

I am hurting
 
Why are you not complaining about big business getting money? Boeing, millions, no problem. Some poor slob getting a few thousand, big problem.

Keep voting republican and supporting the top ten percent and ignore the part that says by the people, for the people.

Yeah, the party that held up the bill for days so they could add a bunch of non Wuhan Corona virus pork into it. They care so much about the people, haha.
 
Yeah, the party that held up the bill for days so they could add a bunch of non Wuhan Corona virus pork into it. They care so much about the people, haha.

There has been three stimulus bills pass into legislation which one is it?
 
This is a time of jubilation as to the free monies by the govt. instead of the penny pinching, live by a thread times that are the norm..

instead of the penny pinching

Well, you could have a lot of extra money if you would stop smoking Dope?
 
Talk radio right wing wingers never do that!

The man in their AM radio works for Wall Street and big oil.

Well, along with passing Obamacare, maybe the Dem's should have done something about that back in the day?
 
We have an anguished opinion about government workers and no substantiated evidence.

Well James, I am one of those state gov workers being paid for not working

Stimulus $$$ on the way

Yep
 
Back
Top Bottom