• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
111,496
Reaction score
101,811
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

The 69-page document, finished in 2016, provided a step by step list of priorities – which were then ignored by the Trump administration.

JQ5VLNN4PBHQFDCDGKUWKU4KPA.jpg

Trump ignored a prepared pandemic defense manual. Now we pay the price.

2/25/20
The Trump administration, state officials and even individual hospital workers are now racing against each other to get the necessary masks, gloves and other safety equipment to fight coronavirus — a scramble that hospitals and doctors say has come too late and left them at risk. But according to a previously unrevealed White House playbook, the government should’ve begun a federal-wide effort to procure that personal protective equipment at least two months ago. “Is there sufficient personal protective equipment for healthcare workers who are providing medical care?” the playbook instructs its readers, as one early decision that officials should address when facing a potential pandemic. “If YES: What are the triggers to signal exhaustion of supplies? Are additional supplies available? If NO: Should the Strategic National Stockpile release PPE to states?” The strategies are among hundreds of tactics and key policy decisions laid out in a 69-page National Security Council playbook on fighting pandemics. Other recommendations include that the government move swiftly to fully detect potential outbreaks, secure supplemental funding and consider invoking the Defense Production Act — all steps in which the Trump administration lagged behind the timeline laid out in the playbook. “Each section of this playbook includes specific questions that should be asked and decisions that should be made at multiple levels” within the national security apparatus, the playbook urges, repeatedly advising officials to question the numbers on viral spread, ensure appropriate diagnostic capacity and check on the U.S. stockpile of emergency resources.

The playbook also stresses the significant responsibility facing the White House to contain risks of potential pandemics, a stark contrast with the Trump administration’s delays in deploying an all-of-government response and President Donald Trump's recent signals that he might roll back public health recommendations. The guide further calls for a “unified message” on the federal response, in order to best manage the American public's questions and concerns. The NSC devised the guide — officially called the Playbook for Early Response to High-Consequence Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and Biological Incidents, but known colloquially as “the pandemic playbook” — across 2016. The Trump administration was briefed on the playbook’s existence in 2017, said four former officials. The playbook was designed “so there wasn’t piecemeal thinking when trying to fight the next public health battle,” said one former official who contributed to the playbook, warning that “the fog of war” can lead to gaps in strategies. Under that timeline, the federal government by late January should have been taking a lead role in “coordination of workforce protection activities including… [personal protective equipment] determination, procurement and deployment.” Those efforts are only now getting underway, health workers and doctors say. It is not clear if the administration’s failure to follow the NSC playbook was the result of an oversight or a deliberate decision to follow a different course.

Is anyone here honestly surprised that the Trump administration ignored a pandemic manual prepared by the Obama administration which could have averted/attenuated our supply catastrophe?

A rhetorical question.
 
Trump demands adulation and personal reassurance. If the playbook didn’t contribute to those ends then it never stood a chance of being followed.
 
Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

The 69-page document, finished in 2016, provided a step by step list of priorities – which were then ignored by the Trump administration.

JQ5VLNN4PBHQFDCDGKUWKU4KPA.jpg

Trump ignored a prepared pandemic defense manual. Now we pay the price.



Is anyone here honestly surprised that the Trump administration ignored a pandemic manual prepared by the Obama administration which could have averted/attenuated our supply catastrophe?

A rhetorical question.

Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.
 
Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

The 69-page document, finished in 2016, provided a step by step list of priorities – which were then ignored by the Trump administration.

JQ5VLNN4PBHQFDCDGKUWKU4KPA.jpg

Trump ignored a prepared pandemic defense manual. Now we pay the price.



Is anyone here honestly surprised that the Trump administration ignored a pandemic manual prepared by the Obama administration which could have averted/attenuated our supply catastrophe?

A rhetorical question.

What makes the NSC more of an authority than, oh...the CDC or HHS
 
Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.

That would imply they even bothered to try the plan, which was in place to help avoid that very situation.
 
What makes the NSC more of an authority than, oh...the CDC or HHS

You clearly did not read the link or even the quotes in the OP. Dismissed.
 
Trump demands adulation and personal reassurance. If the playbook didn’t contribute to those ends then it never stood a chance of being followed.

Trump is more in worried with who he can blame at this point in time.
 
Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.

No Sir, the truth is.... :roll:

Lack of a plan is the biggest factor in LOSING a war....

General Eisenhower put it well- he thought plans rarely were followed closely but the exercise did create a staff experienced and flexible. The various plans could be gleaned for appropriate parts to cobble together a plan meeting the new conditions. Time after time in the race across France, planned operations were cancelled because ground forces were passed the airborne drop zones. But the planning exercises did help when the German resistance stiffened.

Now the old playbook does have relevant parts, does set-up a stockpile, a line of communication and flow paths. What it can never do is force the leadership to use the plan.

That was the problem, a twit in chief who downplayed the virus as it spread... so more like a lack of mature responsible leadership is the biggest roadblock to this plan... :peace
 
Their singular focus was just this type of thing?

Wrong.

The NSC is focused on much more than "this type of thing". Obama had 450 people in his NSC. They were not singularly focused on this type of thing.
 
You clearly did not read the link or even the quotes in the OP. Dismissed.

I read the quote in the OP. I didn't see anything there that answers my question.
 
Back
Top Bottom