• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I'm following the COVID-19 Protocol... But I am STILL a LITTLE skeptical of this whole thing......

Mashmont

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
18,604
Reaction score
1,541
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
OK, I am following the COVID protocol very closely. I don't go out unless I have to. I try to go during less busy hours. I keep the six-foot distance where possible. I take wipes everywhere with me and wipe my hands when I get back in the car and wash my hands when I get home.

But in the back of my mind, there is still a little questioning. Here are 8 reasons why:

1. I am a math geek, a numbers geek. I follow the number of cases and deaths extremely closely and keep a log of them. I also break them down by cities. The site I follow is infection2020.com because it is supposedly the most current. What aggravates me is the advancing and retreating of numbers. For example, the site reported 610 national deaths. At this moment, it says 593. It's been that way for case numbers too, sudden spikes, then sudden retreats. Makes me wonder.

2. Given the violation of trust by the country's most respected agencies in recent months, the FBI, the Justice Department, the State Department which committed crimes to try to get Hillary elected, and then covered it up by trying to frame and impeach Trump, I now wonder if ANYTHING is beneath these people, even to the point of pushing a fake pandemic that would crash the economy and create fear in an election year. We already know the media would be cooperative. These numbers we get? What if they are produced by deep-staters in the CDC? Who knows if they are real?

3. Remember 55,000 to 80,000 people die every year because of the flu. Mostly elderly people. How convenient it is COVID-19 fatalities are almost exclusive to very old people. Makes it much easier to meld these deaths with things like pneumonia and the flu. Then the causes of deaths of these vast numbers become nebulous and hard to sort out. Of these deaths, are any really just the flu? Are all just the flu?

4. Youtube has vloggers who make vids on everything under the sun. 35 videos on how to remove a boil on your leg. But PRECIOUS FEW from actual current coronavirus sufferers. Yes, there are a few mostly after the fact. But for something so internationally widespread, one would think there would be hundreds of videos. There aren't. And here is a question: How many of you in the forum personally know someone who has died or says they have the coronavirus? How many have you personally talked to? Anybody?

5. Details, symptoms, risk odds, prognoses of COVID-19 are extremely hard to find. In this information age, I can't find out the answer to simple question. "What are the odds of my getting sick from going to the store and following the protocols? What are the odds of my getting it if I don't follow the protocols? Is lung damage inevitable, possible, or remote? What are the odds of death for each age group. One would think for a pervasive 'disease' such as this, facts would available easily and everywhere. They are not. That is suspicious.

6. If this situation is so dire in NYC, WHY are local government officials allowing young people to hold block parties and basketball games? Instead of complaining about them, why aren't the police arresting or ticketing offenders. Why aren't they closing down NYC?

7. If the situation were this dire, Democrats and the media would be calling for cooperation, putting all differences aside, and getting past the problem. Instead, there is bald politics, obfuscation and bashing of Trump. Makes me wonder.

8. If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now?? If you wanted to damage a president in an election year, what could you possibly do more effectively than this? If your goal were to crater an economy, and create Soviet-style martial law, what more effective and immediate tactic could you use?
 
OK, I am following the COVID protocol very closely. I don't go out unless I have to. I try to go during less busy hours. I keep the six-foot distance where possible. I take wipes everywhere with me and wipe my hands when I get back in the car and wash my hands when I get home.

But in the back of my mind, there is still a little questioning. Here are 8 reasons why:

1. I am a math geek, a numbers geek. I follow the number of cases and deaths extremely closely and keep a log of them. I also break them down by cities. The site I follow is infection2020.com because it is supposedly the most current. What aggravates me is the advancing and retreating of numbers. For example, the site reported 610 national deaths. At this moment, it says 593. It's been that way for case numbers too, sudden spikes, then sudden retreats. Makes me wonder.

2. Given the violation of trust by the country's most respected agencies in recent months, the FBI, the Justice Department, the State Department which committed crimes to try to get Hillary elected, and then covered it up by trying to frame and impeach Trump, I now wonder if ANYTHING is beneath these people, even to the point of pushing a fake pandemic that would crash the economy and create fear in an election year. We already know the media would be cooperative. These numbers we get? What if they are produced by deep-staters in the CDC? Who knows if they are real?

3. Remember 55,000 to 80,000 people die every year because of the flu. Mostly elderly people. How convenient it is COVID-19 fatalities are almost exclusive to very old people. Makes it much easier to meld these deaths with things like pneumonia and the flu. Then the causes of deaths of these vast numbers become nebulous and hard to sort out. Of these deaths, are any really just the flu? Are all just the flu?

4. Youtube has vloggers who make vids on everything under the sun. 35 videos on how to remove a boil on your leg. But PRECIOUS FEW from actual current coronavirus sufferers. Yes, there are a few mostly after the fact. But for something so internationally widespread, one would think there would be hundreds of videos. There aren't. And here is a question: How many of you in the forum personally know someone who has died or says they have the coronavirus? How many have you personally talked to? Anybody?

5. Details, symptoms, risk odds, prognoses of COVID-19 are extremely hard to find. In this information age, I can't find out the answer to simple question. "What are the odds of my getting sick from going to the store and following the protocols? What are the odds of my getting it if I don't follow the protocols? Is lung damage inevitable, possible, or remote? What are the odds of death for each age group. One would think for a pervasive 'disease' such as this, facts would available easily and everywhere. They are not. That is suspicious.

6. If this situation is so dire in NYC, WHY are local government officials allowing young people to hold block parties and basketball games? Instead of complaining about them, why aren't the police arresting or ticketing offenders. Why aren't they closing down NYC?

7. If the situation were this dire, Democrats and the media would be calling for cooperation, putting all differences aside, and getting past the problem. Instead, there is bald politics, obfuscation and bashing of Trump. Makes me wonder.

8. If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now?? If you wanted to damage a president in an election year, what could you possibly do more effectively than this? If your goal were to crater an economy, and create Soviet-style martial law, what more effective and immediate tactic could you use?





Let's just take one.

If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now??

Sooooo, you're saying the virus is manmade?
 
Let's just take one.

If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now??

Sooooo, you're saying the virus is manmade?

No, I'm saying it may be just another strain of a cold or flu. It has been around for a long time. I'm saying it is possibly being hyped and exaggerated this year.
 
Let's just take one.

If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now??

Sooooo, you're saying the virus is manmade?

I wonder if there needs to be a betting pool on when trump publicly advances that theory.
 
I wonder if there needs to be a betting pool on when trump publicly advances that theory.

Coronavirus isn't new, but it's being presented as new. I'm wondering if this is just another strain of the common cold or flu that is being hyped this year for obvious reasons.
 
I wonder if there needs to be a betting pool on when trump publicly advances that theory.

I'm sure it's soon to make the rounds through Hannity, Levin and Limbaugh soon.
 
No, I'm saying it may be just another strain of a cold or flu. It has been around for a long time. I'm saying it is possibly being hyped and exaggerated this year.

Well then, if you feel certain about that, and if you live in a deeply red state, go get a flu vaccination and you’ll be all good.
 
Last edited:
OK, I am following the COVID protocol very closely. I don't go out unless I have to. I try to go during less busy hours. I keep the six-foot distance where possible. I take wipes everywhere with me and wipe my hands when I get back in the car and wash my hands when I get home.

But in the back of my mind, there is still a little questioning. Here are 8 reasons why:

1. I am a math geek, a numbers geek. I follow the number of cases and deaths extremely closely and keep a log of them. I also break them down by cities. The site I follow is infection2020.com because it is supposedly the most current. What aggravates me is the advancing and retreating of numbers. For example, the site reported 610 national deaths. At this moment, it says 593. It's been that way for case numbers too, sudden spikes, then sudden retreats. Makes me wonder.

2. Given the violation of trust by the country's most respected agencies in recent months, the FBI, the Justice Department, the State Department which committed crimes to try to get Hillary elected, and then covered it up by trying to frame and impeach Trump, I now wonder if ANYTHING is beneath these people, even to the point of pushing a fake pandemic that would crash the economy and create fear in an election year. We already know the media would be cooperative. These numbers we get? What if they are produced by deep-staters in the CDC? Who knows if they are real?

3. Remember 55,000 to 80,000 people die every year because of the flu. Mostly elderly people. How convenient it is COVID-19 fatalities are almost exclusive to very old people. Makes it much easier to meld these deaths with things like pneumonia and the flu. Then the causes of deaths of these vast numbers become nebulous and hard to sort out. Of these deaths, are any really just the flu? Are all just the flu?

4. Youtube has vloggers who make vids on everything under the sun. 35 videos on how to remove a boil on your leg. But PRECIOUS FEW from actual current coronavirus sufferers. Yes, there are a few mostly after the fact. But for something so internationally widespread, one would think there would be hundreds of videos. There aren't. And here is a question: How many of you in the forum personally know someone who has died or says they have the coronavirus? How many have you personally talked to? Anybody?

5. Details, symptoms, risk odds, prognoses of COVID-19 are extremely hard to find. In this information age, I can't find out the answer to simple question. "What are the odds of my getting sick from going to the store and following the protocols? What are the odds of my getting it if I don't follow the protocols? Is lung damage inevitable, possible, or remote? What are the odds of death for each age group. One would think for a pervasive 'disease' such as this, facts would available easily and everywhere. They are not. That is suspicious.

6. If this situation is so dire in NYC, WHY are local government officials allowing young people to hold block parties and basketball games? Instead of complaining about them, why aren't the police arresting or ticketing offenders. Why aren't they closing down NYC?

7. If the situation were this dire, Democrats and the media would be calling for cooperation, putting all differences aside, and getting past the problem. Instead, there is bald politics, obfuscation and bashing of Trump. Makes me wonder.

8. If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now?? If you wanted to damage a president in an election year, what could you possibly do more effectively than this? If your goal were to crater an economy, and create Soviet-style martial law, what more effective and immediate tactic could you use?
Literally every single point here is unsupported.
 
Well then, if you feel certain about, and if you live in a deeply red state, go get a flu vaccination and you’ll be all good.

I stated in my OP I am following all the protocols just to be safe, but I really have to wonder....
 
Coronavirus isn't new, but it's being presented as new. I'm wondering if this is just another strain of the common cold or flu that is being hyped this year for obvious reasons.

Good gosh, for this to be true, the entire world has to be in on this anti-Trump conspiracy.
 
I'm sure it's soon to make the rounds through Hannity, Levin and Limbaugh soon.

So you think Hannity and Rush read my material? Thanks!
 
Good gosh, for this to be true, the entire world has to be in on this anti-Trump conspiracy.

No, but the entire world can fall for a Marxist and media conspiracy. Look how many people bought the ridiculous notion that the WMD suddenly vanished between 2002 and 2004.
 
Literally every single point here is unsupported.

It certainly looks like the "shelter in place cure" being promoted by this panic is going to do more damage to more tens of millions of Americans than the damage that will be done to older Americans who are always at risk and have always been at risk of catching the flu and dying from it.
 
No, but the entire world can fall for a Marxist and media conspiracy. Look how many people bought the ridiculous notion that the WMD suddenly vanished between 2002 and 2004.

Using "Marxist and media conspiracy" in a sentence doesn't make your theory any less stupid.
 
OK, I am following the COVID protocol very closely. I don't go out unless I have to. I try to go during less busy hours. I keep the six-foot distance where possible. I take wipes everywhere with me and wipe my hands when I get back in the car and wash my hands when I get home.

But in the back of my mind, there is still a little questioning. Here are 8 reasons why:

1. I am a math geek, a numbers geek. I follow the number of cases and deaths extremely closely and keep a log of them. I also break them down by cities. The site I follow is infection2020.com because it is supposedly the most current. What aggravates me is the advancing and retreating of numbers. For example, the site reported 610 national deaths. At this moment, it says 593. It's been that way for case numbers too, sudden spikes, then sudden retreats. Makes me wonder.

2. Given the violation of trust by the country's most respected agencies in recent months, the FBI, the Justice Department, the State Department which committed crimes to try to get Hillary elected, and then covered it up by trying to frame and impeach Trump, I now wonder if ANYTHING is beneath these people, even to the point of pushing a fake pandemic that would crash the economy and create fear in an election year. We already know the media would be cooperative. These numbers we get? What if they are produced by deep-staters in the CDC? Who knows if they are real?

3. Remember 55,000 to 80,000 people die every year because of the flu. Mostly elderly people. How convenient it is COVID-19 fatalities are almost exclusive to very old people. Makes it much easier to meld these deaths with things like pneumonia and the flu. Then the causes of deaths of these vast numbers become nebulous and hard to sort out. Of these deaths, are any really just the flu? Are all just the flu?

4. Youtube has vloggers who make vids on everything under the sun. 35 videos on how to remove a boil on your leg. But PRECIOUS FEW from actual current coronavirus sufferers. Yes, there are a few mostly after the fact. But for something so internationally widespread, one would think there would be hundreds of videos. There aren't. And here is a question: How many of you in the forum personally know someone who has died or says they have the coronavirus? How many have you personally talked to? Anybody?

5. Details, symptoms, risk odds, prognoses of COVID-19 are extremely hard to find. In this information age, I can't find out the answer to simple question. "What are the odds of my getting sick from going to the store and following the protocols? What are the odds of my getting it if I don't follow the protocols? Is lung damage inevitable, possible, or remote? What are the odds of death for each age group. One would think for a pervasive 'disease' such as this, facts would available easily and everywhere. They are not. That is suspicious.

6. If this situation is so dire in NYC, WHY are local government officials allowing young people to hold block parties and basketball games? Instead of complaining about them, why aren't the police arresting or ticketing offenders. Why aren't they closing down NYC?

7. If the situation were this dire, Democrats and the media would be calling for cooperation, putting all differences aside, and getting past the problem. Instead, there is bald politics, obfuscation and bashing of Trump. Makes me wonder.

8. If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now?? If you wanted to damage a president in an election year, what could you possibly do more effectively than this? If your goal were to crater an economy, and create Soviet-style martial law, what more effective and immediate tactic could you use?
You say you are a math geek. Calculate for me how long it has been taking, on average, for cases to double in the US.
 
I stated in my OP I am following all the protocols just to be safe, but I really have to wonder....

I think you should reinforce your skepticism and just go out fully unprotected and test your beliefs.
 
It certainly looks like the "shelter in place cure" being promoted by this panic is going to do more damage to more tens of millions of Americans than the damage that will be done to older Americans who are always at risk and have always been at risk of catching the flu and dying from it.
As morbid an argument as you're making here, it is at least a valid argument depending upon one's values and perceptions. I'm fine with your stating your position, and in fact I'm leaning to having localized quarantine levels predicated upon the situation on the ground. But the OP's presumptions strike me as unsupported nonsense.
 
Let's just take one.

If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now??

Sooooo, you're saying the virus is manmade?
Yep. It seems he's gone from 'Dem Hoax', to 'Dem Conspiracy'.

But I suspect he will never make it to, 'Trump Responsibility'.
 
No, I'm saying it may be just another strain of a cold or flu. It has been around for a long time. I'm saying it is possibly being hyped and exaggerated this year.

By the entire world medical community. Exaggerated.

Dumbest post of the week.
 
It certainly looks like the "shelter in place cure" being promoted by this panic is going to do more damage to more tens of millions of Americans than the damage that will be done to older Americans who are always at risk and have always been at risk of catching the flu and dying from it.

It's not just older people, but people who have compromised immune systems which broadens it to people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes etc. regardless of age.
 
You say you are a math geek. Calculate for me how long it has been taking, on average, for cases to double in the US.

I've been reading the log graph at Worldometer. Equally troubling thing for me is the 10x time period - about 8 days or so. And that curve is straight as an arrow so far. If the trends hold, we're three-four days from 100k. 8-9 days later a million. Hopefully all the stay at home orders cause a flattening of the curve.

That's what the "it's the ECONOMY that matters!!" arguments don't address. They assume that curve flattens if we don't shelter at home, but cannot tell us why or how.

Screen Shot 2020-03-24 at 12.49.34 PM.jpg
 
I wonder if there needs to be a betting pool on when trump publicly advances that theory.

If he sees it on Fox, a couple of hours, tops.
 
Let's just take one.

If you were going to try to disrupt a roaring economy and turn it into disaster on a dime, If that was you goal, what BETTER more EFFECTIVE way is there to do it, than what is being done right now??

Sooooo, you're saying the virus is manmade?

I see his number 3 is wrong. CDC average number of deaths is 37,400 per year from seasonal flu between 2010 and 2019. Not good for a math geek.

And his number 8 is in bold face.
Does this mean our friends in Moscow are stooping to dirty tricks? By exposing China, Italy, Spain, all of Europe, The US, and the rest of the globe?
And his second thought along the SABOTAGE LINE is an even better way to disrupt and divide our already schizoid nation.
Because of course we can't believe anything. Unless we see it on FOX.
 
Back
Top Bottom