• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:1059]Man dies after taking chloroquine phosphate in effort to prevent coronavirus

Status
Not open for further replies.
[h=3]Woman Who Ate Fish Tank Cleaner, Blamed Trump, Donated ...[/h]www.dailywire.com › news › woman-who-ate-fish-tank-cleaner-blam...
jFwJ2m5khZUXEAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC






16 hours ago - The Arizona woman who ingested fish tank cleaner along with her husband ... Woman Who Ate Fish Tank Cleaner, Blamed Trump, Donated Thousands To Democrat Causes ... The drug, known as chloroquine phosphate or chloroquine, has ... They took it because they “were afraid of getting sick,” she said.
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=3]Surprise, surprise: woman who ingested fish tank cleaner is a ...[/h]www.econjobrumors.com › topic › surprise-surprise-woman-who-ing...
AB0BILAisAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC






Surprise, surprise: woman who ingested fish tank cleaner is a hardcore Dem ... used to clean fish tanks after hearing President Donald Turnip tout chloroquine as a cure for ... The woman's most recent donations, in late February, were to a Democratic PAC, the ... More proof that ejmr has been taken over by non economists.
Click to expand...

UNDEPENDABLE! ALL OF 'EM, dammit!

OGC.99f1de06e833f1d3a23a728adccc772a
 
Jack Hays said:
The Arizona Couple That Drank Aquarium Cleaner Are ...

granitegrok.com › blog › 2020/03 › the-arizona-couple-that-drank-aq...
AC9E0JHpwCvuYAAAAASUVORK5CYII=





13 hours ago - The Arizona Couple That Drank Aquarium Cleaner Are Democrats Who ... a couple in Arizona drank fish tank cleaner with chloroquine in it. ... Mr. Trump never suggested it, hinted at it, nor said anyone should take just anything. ... and EMILY's List, a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates.
Click to expand...

Got a question: since you’ve started spamming the thread with these right wing rag links, did you bother to read a single one beyond the headline?

I’ll bet you didn’t. No, scratch that: I know you didn’t.
 
Cardinal said:
Got a question: since you’ve started spamming the thread with these right wing rag links, did you bother to read a single one beyond the headline?

I’ll bet you didn’t. No, scratch that: I know you didn’t.
Click to expand...

Read 'em all. I suspect it's lonely with only your lies for company.
 
Jack Hays said:
Read 'em all.
Click to expand...

No, obviously you didn’t. Because if you had you would know that every single one of them is citing the same fake news source: the Washington Free Beacon. So you either didn’t click on those links or you think I’m as lazy as you are and wouldn’t check to see their sources.

It’s amazing how much time you’ve taken to fail this badly.
 
Cardinal said:
No, obviously you didn’t. Because if you had you would know that every single one of them is citing the same fake news source: the Washington Free Beacon. So you either didn’t click on those links or you think I’m as lazy as you are and wouldn’t check to see their sources.

It’s amazing how much time you’ve taken to fail this badly.
Click to expand...

Has the source been discredited? Link please.
 
Cardinal said:
No, obviously you didn’t. Because if you had you would know that every single one of them is citing the same fake news source: the Washington Free Beacon. So you either didn’t click on those links or you think I’m as lazy as you are and wouldn’t check to see their sources.

It’s amazing how much time you’ve taken to fail this badly.
Click to expand...

I'm quite well aware they were all sourced back to the Free Beacon story, which is not at all "fake news." You only use that term because you're in desperate denial and committed to defending your lie.
 
Jack Hays said:
I'm quite well aware they were all sourced back to the Free Beacon story, which is not at all "fake news." You only use that term because you're in desperate denial and committed to defending your lie.
Click to expand...

If you knew they were all sourced back to the same fake news, why did you spend the last umpteen pages spamming them? Admit it: you thought I would be lazy and be impressed by your link-dumping.
 
Cardinal said:
If you knew they were all sourced back to the same fake news, why did you spend the last umpteen pages spamming them? Admit it: you thought I would be lazy and be impressed by your link-dumping.
Click to expand...

I just wanted them on the record, to contrast with your lying denial.
 
Jack Hays said:
I just wanted them on the record, to contrast with your lying denial.
Click to expand...

No, you were link dumping and you thought everybody you debate with would be as lazy as you are. I’ll bet that you still haven’t even bothered to read the original fake news source, because if you had you would see that literally the one central claim in the story that makes it important is the one claim they don’t support. They support every claim but that one.

You were had.
 
Cardinal said:
No, you were link dumping and you thought everybody you debate with would be as lazy as you are. I’ll bet that you still haven’t even bothered to read the original fake news source, because if you had you would see that literally the one central claim in the story that makes it important is the one claim they don’t support. They support every claim but that one.

You were had.
Click to expand...

Wrong again. Still in denial and still lying.

". . . The woman's most recent donations, in late February, were to a Democratic PAC, the 314 Action Fund, that bills itself as the "pro-science resistance" and has vocally criticized the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic and held up her case to slam the White House.
Although local and national media outlets withheld the couple's names, the Washington Free Beacon established their identities through descriptions in local news reports, where the pair were identified by their first names and ages: Gary, 68, and Wanda, 61. The Free Beacon is withholding their identities at Wanda's request.
Federal Election Commission records show that Wanda has donated thousands of dollars to Democratic electoral groups and candidates over the past two years, including Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and EMILY's List, a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates.
Wanda told the Free Beacon that she and her husband were both Democrats, not Trump supporters. . . ."
 
Jack Hays said:
Wrong again. Still in denial and still lying.
Click to expand...

You were either conned or you were trying to perpetuate a con (knowing your history it’s almost certainly the latter but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt).
 
Cardinal said:
You were either conned or you were trying to perpetuate a con (knowing your history it’s almost certainly the latter but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt).
Click to expand...

The story is accurate. Which reporting do you dispute?

". . . The woman's most recent donations, in late February, were to a Democratic PAC, the 314 Action Fund, that bills itself as the "pro-science resistance" and has vocally criticized the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic and held up her case to slam the White House.
Although local and national media outlets withheld the couple's names, the Washington Free Beacon established their identities through descriptions in local news reports, where the pair were identified by their first names and ages: Gary, 68, and Wanda, 61. The Free Beacon is withholding their identities at Wanda's request.
Federal Election Commission records show that Wanda has donated thousands of dollars to Democratic electoral groups and candidates over the past two years, including Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and EMILY's List, a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates.
Wanda told the Free Beacon that she and her husband were both Democrats, not Trump supporters. . . ."

Woman Who Ingested Fish Tank Cleaner Was Prolific Donor ...

freebeacon.com › latest-news › woman-who-ingested-fish-tank-cleane...
mKffMnQQ4g8MoDiBkvkUtFgC8kJCLEnnYTIVQs8aEmrBSy7a73iRazBUw2xNCyvvjaV69RrWeG6jzx2 QUJeeQ0qz8RzeNPv8wzeCaXZzBGPi48Y PzNUBbBa1dTWAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC





16 hours ago - Packets of a Nivaquine, tablets containing chloroquine and Plaqueril ... the couple's names, the Washington Free Beacon established their ...


 
Last edited:
Jack Hays said:
The story is accurate. Which reporting do you dispute?

". . . The woman's most recent donations, in late February, were to a Democratic PAC, the 314 Action Fund, that bills itself as the "pro-science resistance" and has vocally criticized the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic and held up her case to slam the White House.
Although local and national media outlets withheld the couple's names, the Washington Free Beacon established their identities through descriptions in local news reports, where the pair were identified by their first names and ages: Gary, 68, and Wanda, 61. The Free Beacon is withholding their identities at Wanda's request.
Federal Election Commission records show that Wanda has donated thousands of dollars to Democratic electoral groups and candidates over the past two years, including Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and EMILY's List, a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates.
Wanda told the Free Beacon that she and her husband were both Democrats, not Trump supporters. . . ."
Click to expand...

The link in that story doesn’t support the central claim. All it does is show that a certain PAC exists. It doesn’t show that the couple donated to it.

Again, you keep getting conned or you’re perpetuating the con. Which is it?
 
Jack Hays said:
Indeed. You will henceforward be famous for having been bushwhacked by the facts. That sort of "Oops!" episode will be known as "pulling a Cardinal."

:doh:lol:
Click to expand...

Rachel Maddow pulled a Cardinal last week when she said there's no way the Hospital Ship Comfort would be in NY this week. It arrived yesterday.

Now keep in mind there are numerous sources for that including Wikipedia but as we know Wikipedia's reliability (as well as any story) depends entirely on whether Cardinal wants to believe it.
The source for that wiki entry is Crowds Greet USNS Comfort in NYC Monday; Ship to Help Hospitals With Non-Coronavirus Patients – NBC New York so we await the final word.
 
Cardinal said:
The link in that story doesn’t support the central claim. All it does is show that a certain PAC exists. It doesn’t show that the couple donated to it.

Again, you keep getting conned or you’re perpetuating the con. Which is it?
Click to expand...

No one claimed the link corroborated the donation. That's your desperate and dishonest strawman. I'm quite confident that if the story were false, given its wide circulation, the debunkers would have descended in battalion strength. They are nowhere to be found. Why? Because it's true.
 
Jack Hays said:
No one claimed the link corroborated the donation. That's your desperate and dishonest strawman. I'm quite confident that if the story were false, given its wide circulation, the debunkers would have descended in battalion strength. They are nowhere to be found. Why? Because it's true.
Click to expand...

Like your link dumping, you thought I would be too lazy to go to the article to see if the central claim was supported. I wasn’t lazy, and the central claim was not supported. In fact, the article supported everything but the central claim.

Your entire effort to con me was dependent on me being lazy. It didn’t work.

Nice try, though.
 
Cardinal said:
Like your link dumping, you thought I would be too lazy to go to the article to see if the central claim was supported. It wasn’t. In fact, it supported everything but that.

Your entire effort to con me was dependent on me being lazy. It didn’t work.

Nice try, though.
Click to expand...

You're not lazy. Lying is hard work. Denial is too. Nonetheless, I'm at least please to see this thread expose you.
 
Jack Hays said:
You're not lazy. Lying is hard work. Denial is too. Nonetheless, I'm at least please to see this thread expose you.
Click to expand...

You were caught pulling a con. It didn’t work. Now, if you have something aside from fake news to support your position, I will be happy to consider it. But please, no more link dumping to the same fake news article.
 
Cardinal said:
Like your link dumping, you thought I would be too lazy to go to the article to see if the central claim was supported. I wasn’t lazy, and the central claim was not supported. In fact, the article supported everything but the central claim.

Your entire effort to con me was dependent on me being lazy. It didn’t work.

Nice try, though.
Click to expand...

"Any link in a storm" is pretty popular around here and it's supported by conspiracy blogs doing the same.
 
Cardinal said:
Like your link dumping, you thought I would be too lazy to go to the article to see if the central claim was supported. I wasn’t lazy, and the central claim was not supported. In fact, the article supported everything but the central claim.

Your entire effort to con me was dependent on me being lazy. It didn’t work.

Nice try, though.
Click to expand...

It’s just shocking that jack would post crappy links.

How often does that happen?

Oh.... every half hour.
 
Threegoofs said:
It’s just shocking that jack would post crappy links.

How often does that happen?

Oh.... every half hour.
Click to expand...

Redstate, amgreatness, powerlineblog, dailywire, granitegrok, dailywire (Again! He literally posted the same link twice!). And all go to the same crap fake news article.

The laziness of his con job is insulting.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom