• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Music of the 60 70's was not what you think it was.

Most people who made the music in the 60 and 70's like "The Mama's and the papa's ", "The Monkees", "The Doors","The Beach Boys","Frank Zappa" and all the others were actually controlled from Lookout Mountain , a military base in Laurel Canyon.
yes, the 'musicians' were orchestrated by the army. nearly all their parents had connections with the military.
There was nothing 'free' about it at all.

And the CIA was providing all the drugs or at least the drugs the person who wrote the book was taking. I have to admit that is one of the more outrageous conspiracy theories I've come across.
 
And the CIA was providing all the drugs or at least the drugs the person who wrote the book was taking. I have to admit that is one of the more outrageous conspiracy theories I've come across.

Well, the C.I.A and others of course are indeed into the drugtrade, one of the reasons why usa invaded afghanistan, because
of 9/11. Also another argument why 9-11 was indeed an inside job, just like the corona virus hoax at the moment is.

Being outrageous maybe, but so what? The only thing that matters is if it is true or not.
I can tell you the whole truth is even way more outrageous then you even can imagine. But that doesn't make it untrue,
 
Last edited:
Well, the C.I.A and others of course are indeed into the drugtrade, one of the reasons why usa invaded afghanistan, because
of 9/11. Also another argument why 9-11 was indeed an inside job, just like the corona virus hoax at the moment is.

Being outrageous maybe, but so what? The only thing that matters is if it is true or not.
I can tell you the whole truth is even way more outrageous then you even can imagine. But that doesn't make it untrue,

What about some evidence? Let's start with Jack Nicholson cleaning up murder scenes. Quote some evidence from the book. You appear to be one of the 'everything is a conspiracy' people. No evidence necessary.
 
Well, the C.I.A and others of course are indeed into the drugtrade, one of the reasons why usa invaded afghanistan, because
of 9/11. Also another argument why 9-11 was indeed an inside job, just like the corona virus hoax at the moment is.

Being outrageous maybe, but so what? The only thing that matters is if it is true or not.
I can tell you the whole truth is even way more outrageous then you even can imagine. But that doesn't make it untrue,

So, tell me, what's it like when you fall off the cliff into the deep end? Over a hundred and thirty thousand dead in our country and you call it a hoax but believe 9/11 was an inside job. How old are you? Sixteen?
 
So, tell me, what's it like when you fall off the cliff into the deep end? Over a hundred and thirty thousand dead in our country and you call it a hoax but believe 9/11 was an inside job. How old are you? Sixteen?

Well, well, read my postings at covid-19. Yes a hoax, but I don't mean there are no dead people. Like 9/11 I also didn't wrote there are no dead people. But, yes, the whole thing is a hoax, in that we are deeply disinformed by the msm.

But that really is for another thread.
 
Well, well, read my postings at covid-19. Yes a hoax, but I don't mean there are no dead people. Like 9/11 I also didn't wrote there are no dead people. But, yes, the whole thing is a hoax, in that we are deeply disinformed by the msm.

But that really is for another thread.

Meanwhile, in this thread post the evidence about Jack Nicholson.
 
I am waiting for the Jack Nicholson evidence.
 
We will conclude that Palandro has no evidence. What a surprise!
 
Well, well, read my postings at covid-19. Yes a hoax, but I don't mean there are no dead people. Like 9/11 I also didn't wrote there are no dead people. But, yes, the whole thing is a hoax, in that we are deeply disinformed by the msm.

But that really is for another thread.

If you've read the book in question, why are you unable to quote an excerpt or two to back up your Nicholson claims?
 
Well, well, read my postings at covid-19. Yes a hoax, but I don't mean there are no dead people. Like 9/11 I also didn't wrote there are no dead people. But, yes, the whole thing is a hoax, in that we are deeply disinformed by the msm.

But that really is for another thread.

If Covid 19 is a hoax then who persuaded every doctor and nurse in the world to play along?
 
Still a paucity of evidence for the Jack Nicholson nonsense.
 
You haven't read it, because if you had, you wouldn't aks this question.

Aliens made hate-babies inside of Trump's brain, but I can't cite the evidence for that or even quote my source. You'll have to read Richard Dawkin's, 'The God Delusion' to get the whole story.
 
Aliens made hate-babies inside of Trump's brain, but I can't cite the evidence for that or even quote my source. You'll have to read Richard Dawkin's, 'The God Delusion' to get the whole story.

you know my source. And it is even worse then that is written there,
the whole of Hollywood is filled with pedophiles and satansist, so, Hollywoon=cesspit.
 
Last edited:
you know my source. And it is even worse then that is written there,
the whole of Hollywood is filled with pedophiles and satansist, so, Hollywoon=cesspit.

Nobody is going to buy and read a book just because you say it proves some nonsense. That's not how this works.
 
Nobody is going to buy and read a book just because you say it proves some nonsense. That's not how this works.

How it works? You are funny! You know everyone who reads this, right?

and btw what is the nonsense?

btw who cares if people buy the book?


well, you are funny, in a way.
 
you know my source. And it is even worse then that is written there,
the whole of Hollywood is filled with pedophiles and satansist, so, Hollywoon=cesspit.

Another proof free statement. Jack Nicholson.
 
How it works? You are funny! You know everyone who reads this, right?

and btw what is the nonsense?

btw who cares if people buy the book?


well, you are funny, in a way.

You are hilarious, in a non-informed, evidence free way. Jack Nicholson. When are you going to post some evidence from the book that you obviously have never read?
 
How it works? You are funny! You know everyone who reads this, right?

and btw what is the nonsense?

btw who cares if people buy the book?


well, you are funny, in a way.

Is English your first language? I'm getting the distinct feeling that we're having some communication issues.
 
Is English your first language? I'm getting the distinct feeling that we're having some communication issues.

no, it isn't

But where is the problem then? I think it is rather clear what I wrote.. Even for you.
 
no, it isn't

But where is the problem then? I think it is rather clear what I wrote.. Even for you.

Okay, let's try this again. You are making a claim about music of an era being controlled. You cite a book as your source. People don't do that on forums, because we generally cite information that's easily accessible and easily scrutinized by anyone. You need to link us to a valid source that supports your claim, or else there is no reason for any of us to beleive that claim. You tell us the information is in a book . . . that book either has valid sources, or it is bull****.

Can you quote this book? If you can quote a passage, what source does that passage come from? If we were even to buy and read this book, then how do we even know that what is contained within isn't valid? You do realize, that just because people put text onto paper, that this doesn't make the content reality, right?

This is what we would call, 'burden of proof'.

This should be fairly simple to understand, 'even for you'.
 
Okay, let's try this again. You are making a claim about music of an era being controlled. You cite a book as your source. People don't do that on forums, because we generally cite information that's easily accessible and easily scrutinized by anyone. You need to link us to a valid source that supports your claim, or else there is no reason for any of us to beleive that claim. You tell us the information is in a book . . . that book either has valid sources, or it is bull****.

Can you quote this book? If you can quote a passage, what source does that passage come from? If we were even to buy and read this book, then how do we even know that what is contained within isn't valid? You do realize, that just because people put text onto paper, that this doesn't make the content reality, right?

This is what we would call, 'burden of proof'.

This should be fairly simple to understand, 'even for you'.

when is 'the source valid"? when people believe it? when people don't believe it? when it is written on purple paper? just some questions to ponder.






what is the problem? just read the book and do the research that is the only way to go with this information. People being lazy is not my problem, at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom