• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof it was Rich who leaked, not Russia who hacked

M

marke

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2018
Messages
34,752
Reaction score
3,961
Location
north carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
 
Last edited:
Moderator's Warning:
Thread moved to the appropriate section. Be aware that the rules for the Conspiracy Theory section now apply to this thread.
 
marke said:
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
Click to expand...

You have to wonder why the FBI would allow a 3rd party to investigate a Russian hacking of a DNC computer? When did 3rd party computer service companies have unlimited resources like the FBI and when did the FBI decide it would be a good idea to allow a national security issue to be released to a 3rd party?

Why would the FBI not examine the DNC computer servers into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election and not allow any U.S. intelligence agency to perform its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers?

Are we to believe that our own US Intel agencies are now hiring subcontractors to secure and report on National Security issues?
 
marke said:
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
Click to expand...

Democrat responses: Questions about JFK death: CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Questions about Ted Kennedy's solicitation of Russia to help defeat Reagan in 1984 as revealed in declassified Russian documents: CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Accusations from democrats that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian Spy: NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Unproven accusations that Trump colluded with Russians for campaign help in 2016: NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Unsupported allegations that Russians are trying to corrupt the 2020 election in Trump's favor: NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Reports that Joe and Hunter Biden were involved in deals with a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch: CONSPIRACY THEORY!

Reports that democrats in the Obama administration set Trump up in a fake Russian collusion scenario for the purpose of removing him from office: CONSPIRACY THEORY!

I think we can all see how this works.
 
marke said:
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see something directly from Seymour Hersh so I can verify he has said these things. If that's confirmed, then that's definitely something.
 
Condor060 said:
You have to wonder why the FBI would allow a 3rd party to investigate a Russian hacking of a DNC computer? When did 3rd party computer service companies have unlimited resources like the FBI and when did the FBI decide it would be a good idea to allow a national security issue to be released to a 3rd party?

Why would the FBI not examine the DNC computer servers into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election and not allow any U.S. intelligence agency to perform its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers?

Are we to believe that our own US Intel agencies are now hiring subcontractors to secure and report on National Security issues?
Click to expand...

The decades long democrat practice of propagating lies to cover up truth in order to protect their lying narratives was clearly seen in the botched Benghazi affair, the corrupt stacking of the democrat delegates against Bernie in the 2016 democrat primary, the coverup of the Rich murder, the perversion of the Trump phone call, the twisting of testimony of some and the obstructing of testimony from others in the fake impeachment fiasco, and so forth.
 
Fishking said:
I'd like to see something directly from Seymour Hersh so I can verify he has said these things. If that's confirmed, then that's definitely something.
Click to expand...

This guy does not believe Rich was murdered by the DNC mob, but what he says is revealing and totally believable. Sadly, in America, democrats and their cheerleaders in the communist media do everything they can to suppress testimony like this.

Audio: Seymour Hersh States Seth Rich Was WikiLeaks Source - Big League Politics

Seymour Hersh in his own words.
 
marke said:
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
Click to expand...

Do continue.
 
marke said:
What have democrat investigators in DC uncovered about the Seth Rich murder? NOTHING! Why not? because the democrat DC police are covering up the facts, not trying to uncover the facts.

Journalist Seymour Hersh Claims Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH CLAIMS SETH RICH WAS WIKILEAKS SOURCE

What do we know so far about the Rich murder?

1. He was gunned down in the street at night, alone, by unknown assassins for unknown reasons.
2. He was taken to the hospital where he died the next morning under suspicious circumstances.
3. His wallet was not stolen.
4. The computer from his house was stolen.
5. Democrat investigators have no clues as to who murdered him or why.

What do democrats want people to believe?

That Rich was killed in a botched robbery.
That Rich never leaked emails to Assange.
That Russians diddit.
That any interest in the Rich murder is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

And so forth.

What are the problems with the democrat narrative?

1. They offer no proof.
2. They never investigated Rich's or the DNC's computers for clues.
3. Seymour Hersh, a Pilitzer Prize-winning author offers proof that Rich sent the emails to the DNC.
4. Hersh provides facts and details the democrats cannot refute other than to propagate the old standby bogus CONSPIRACY THEORY! narrative.
Click to expand...

The other BIG problem with the official narrative is that the transfer times were way to fast for it to have been hacked on the internet. Those transfer times strongly suggest it was downloaded to a portable device, from the inside.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom