• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary: "We're all going to hang"

M

marke

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2018
Messages
34,752
Reaction score
3,961
Location
north carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
 
No she didn't and you can't provide one single shred of evidence to suggest she did. Why do you make up these lies?

Hilarious that when it comes to Clintons, Trump supporters are willing to believe anything they hear from unnamed sources yet won't believe under-oath accounts from top Trump administration officials.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
No she didn't and you can't provide one single shred of evidence to suggest she did. Why do you make up these lies?

Hilarious that when it comes to Clintons, Trump supporters are willing to believe anything they hear from unnamed sources yet won't believe under-oath accounts from top Trump administration officials.
Click to expand...

For whatever reason there are some people who simply will not believe the thousands of behind the scenes reports which expose Hillary for the very bad person she is. Even when Wikileaks exposed her own emails her supporters saw nothing but purity on her part and evil on the part of anyone who would dare do such a thing as expose the truth for what it is.
 
marke said:
For whatever reason there are some people who simply will not believe the thousands of behind the scenes reports which expose Hillary for the very bad person she is. Even when Wikileaks exposed her own emails her supporters saw nothing but purity on her part and evil on the part of anyone who would dare do such a thing as expose the truth for what it is.
Click to expand...

You provided no evidence for your claim, none. You'll immediately believe the 5th hand account you read on a blog but won't believe the under-oath accounts given by top Trump administration officials. You only believe what you want to believe and nothing else.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
You provided no evidence for your claim, none. You'll immediately believe the 5th hand account you read on a blog but won't believe the under-oath accounts given by top Trump administration officials. You only believe what you want to believe and nothing else.
Click to expand...

Hillary was not the only one with reason to fear a Trump presidency. When Trump won all the crooks in DC lost their immunity from investigation and prosecution for their crimes which had been effectively covered by government officials also part of the crooked mob. Trump campaigned on draining the swamp and the crooks in the swamp knew what he was talking about and intended to do. That is why Adam Schiff and James Comey worked together to provide an insurance policy against the possibility of a Trump presidency. That ios why Brennan and Clapper joined to mob assaults on Trump with false narratives, lying accusations and subversive activities designed to overthrow Trump after he got elected.

Democrats in the House did not get the idea to impeach Trump in 2019, they began exposing their intention to impeach him within an hour of his inauguration.

maxine impeach.jpg
 
marke said:
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
Click to expand...

No links as usual. Do you honestly expect people to accept your conspiratorial blathering as fact when you provide no substantiating evidence? The above thus remains just your opinion, nothing more. Try harder. Oh, Adolf Hitler lived in Spokane after the war; ran a deli. I hear the bratwurst was delicious. It's true, look it up.
 
Last edited:
snakestretcher said:
No links as usual. Do you honestly expect people to accept your conspiratorial blathering as fact when you provide no substantiating evidence? The above thus remains just your opinion, nothing more. Try harder. Oh, Adolf Hitler lived in Spokane after the war; ran a deli. I hear the bratwurst was delicious. It's true, look it up.
Click to expand...

Here is a simple test. Did investigators intend to prosecute Nixon for destroying evidence related to Watergate? Yes. Did prosecutors intend to prosecute Hillary for destroying evidence related to Benghazi and foreign money laundering? No. Why not? Because Hillary was more important than Nixon? I don't think so. Because Hillary was a dirty blond woman and Nixon was a dirty-bearded white guy? No, that was not it either. Because Hillary was a democrat and Nixon was a republican? BINGO!
 
More nonsense from the same source. I would why if all these accusations and going on nearly 4 years hasn't trump and his minions filed any charges no less convicted anyone for these "crimes"? Does the OP ever question that they are being lied to and used?
 
marke said:
Here is a simple test. Did investigators intend to prosecute Nixon for destroying evidence related to Watergate? Yes. Did prosecutors intend to prosecute Hillary for destroying evidence related to Benghazi and foreign money laundering? No. Why not? Because Hillary was more important than Nixon? I don't think so. Because Hillary was a dirty blond woman and Nixon was a dirty-bearded white guy? No, that was not it either. Because Hillary was a democrat and Nixon was a republican? BINGO!
Click to expand...

You have yourself a great day marke; I'm not playing games with you. If you can't be honest in your posts you're frankly not worth wasting time with.
 
Casper said:
More nonsense from the same source. I would why if all these accusations and going on nearly 4 years hasn't trump and his minions filed any charges no less convicted anyone for these "crimes"? Does the OP ever question that they are being lied to and used?
Click to expand...

No, no and no.
 
Casper said:
More nonsense from the same source. I would why if all these accusations and going on nearly 4 years hasn't trump and his minions filed any charges no less convicted anyone for these "crimes"? Does the OP ever question that they are being lied to and used?
Click to expand...

While hordes of democrat cultists continue to defend democrats against investigations into their corruption, America is being seriously damaged by the crimes of the leftist swamp mob who are getting away with their destructive criminal activities because of protection from leftist politicians, judges, law enforcement officials and news media propagandists, most of whom are on a crooked democrat mob payroll of some kind themselves.
 
marke said:
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
Click to expand...

Starting a thread based your total lack of understanding of the context (meaning?) of an alleged Hillary quote related to you by an unnamed individual without any link to its source is a total fail.

 
marke said:
While hordes of democrat cultists continue to defend democrats against investigations into their corruption, America is being seriously damaged by the crimes of the leftist swamp mob who are getting away with their destructive criminal activities because of protection from leftist politicians, judges, law enforcement officials and news media propagandists, most of whom are on a crooked democrat mob payroll of some kind themselves.
Click to expand...

Trump controls the FBI, CIA, NSA, and The Department of Justice, if what you claim were even partially true there would be charges. Sorry but you are just not watching with your eyes open.
 
marke said:
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
Click to expand...

Marke:

Ah, no.

Did Hillary Clinton Say That If Trump Won, 'We're All Going to Hang from Nooses'?

No, Clinton did not write email stating ‘we’re all going to hang from nooses’ if Trump wins | PolitiFact Facebook fact-checks

Fact check yourself please. This is Fake Noose!

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
My God, Hilary is so passé by now.....WHO CARES!

Now its Hillary unbridled. I don't care whether she is unbridled or not. She is not even the grand dame of the Dem Party any longer although she seems oblivious to that simple fact.

Best news we could get: Bill and Hillary get on one of Musk's rocket ships and find a new home out there among Carl Sagan's billions and billions of stars.
 
The Dem Party invented political corruption which the New Democratic Socialist Party continues to carry on that long and rich history even today. I often refer to leftists as belonging to the Party of Corruption, and it is true. The BO Regime was the most corrupt in US history and Globalist Granny was a main player. The FBI/DOJ needs to ferret out ALL corruption and start sending those crooks to prison.
 
DamnYankee said:
The Dem Party invented political corruption which the New Democratic Socialist Party continues to carry on that long and rich history even today. I often refer to leftists as belonging to the Party of Corruption, and it is true. The BO Regime was the most corrupt in US history and Globalist Granny was a main player. The FBI/DOJ needs to ferret out ALL corruption and start sending those crooks to prison.
Click to expand...

Hmmmmmm......the record says otherwise though without doubt the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. Most of those guys died off or.........became Republicans!
 
DamnYankee said:
The Dem Party invented political corruption which the New Democratic Socialist Party continues to carry on that long and rich history even today. I often refer to leftists as belonging to the Party of Corruption, and it is true. The BO Regime was the most corrupt in US history and Globalist Granny was a main player. The FBI/DOJ needs to ferret out ALL corruption and start sending those crooks to prison.
Click to expand...

Uh huh. Did Trump get fined $3 million for stealing donations from a children's charity his 'foundation' set up, to self-promote? Did he have to settle for $25 million for defrauding hundreds of trusting folk with his fake 'university'? So, yeah, it's the democrats who are corrupt:lamo
 
RabidAlpaca said:
No she didn't and you can't provide one single shred of evidence to suggest she did. Why do you make up these lies?

Hilarious that when it comes to Clintons, Trump supporters are willing to believe anything they hear from unnamed sources yet won't believe under-oath accounts from top Trump administration officials.
Click to expand...

Dems have taught me that unconfirmed sources, unconfirmed stories and third hand knowledge is still evidence.

we know this is true because we know Hillary is corrupt, so it is something she would absolutely say trying to cover her butt.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
No she didn't and you can't provide one single shred of evidence to suggest she did. Why do you make up these lies?

Hilarious that when it comes to Clintons, Trump supporters are willing to believe anything they hear from unnamed sources yet won't believe under-oath accounts from top Trump administration officials.
Click to expand...

I knew the Clintons for more than a decade before Bill Clinton took office. This statement by Hillary Clinton is more than credible.
 
Casper said:
Trump controls the FBI, CIA, NSA, and The Department of Justice, if what you claim were even partially true there would be charges. Sorry but you are just not watching with your eyes open.
Click to expand...

NOT so sure about that. I think there are powers Vying for control... remember it has been proven that FBI members DID in fact illegally surveil the Trump campaign due to political bias. We just aren't sure just how deep that bias went.... yet.
 
Hypothetical said:
Dems have taught me that unconfirmed sources, unconfirmed stories and third hand knowledge is still evidence.
we know this is true because we know Hillary is corrupt, so it is something she would absolutely say trying to cover her butt.
Click to expand...

Multiple years of Benghazi hearings led by Republicans and a multi-year fake email investigation, all of which ended in no charges and no evidence of any corruption or wrong-doing. A few months of impeachment investigations and we already have mountains of real evidence and under-oath accounts from multiple top Trump administration officials. Let's just cut the charades and admit you're going to believe whatever you want to believe and you have nothing to back it up with.

Dayton3 said:
I knew the Clintons for more than a decade before Bill Clinton took office. This statement by Hillary Clinton is more than credible.
Click to expand...

Sure you did. Still no evidence or under oath testimonies to support it though huh?
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Multiple years of Benghazi hearings led by Republicans and a multi-year fake email investigation, all of which ended in no charges and no evidence of any corruption or wrong-doing. A few months of impeachment investigations and we already have mountains of real evidence and under-oath accounts from multiple top Trump administration officials. Let's just cut the charades and admit you're going to believe whatever you want to believe and you have nothing to back it up with.
Click to expand...

LOL those weren't fake investigations. we know strange things happened to some of Clintons emails. Benghazi, well it was a worthwhile investigation but in neither of those circumstances did the repubs rely upon third hand testimony as PRIMARY evidence.


no charade here.
 
Hypothetical said:
LOL those weren't fake investigations. we know strange things happened to some of Clintons emails. Benghazi, well it was a worthwhile investigation but in neither of those circumstances did the repubs rely upon third hand testimony as PRIMARY evidence.
no charade here.
Click to expand...

Gotcha, so years of hearings and you have nothing tangible, but you read something on a blog so you're convinced. :lamo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom