• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary: "We're all going to hang"

Dayton3 said:
Are you calling me a liar?
Click to expand...

Yes, absolutely. You can't provide any evidence or point to anything concrete, but you "totally hung out with the Clintons way back in the day", which is why you and you alone know how guilty they are and we should just trust you that you're guilty based on the word of a stranger on the internet. Hard pass.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Gotcha, so years of hearings and you have nothing tangible, but you read something on a blog so you're convinced. :lamo
Click to expand...

no i believe what i hear in the actual proceedings, thanks. and as far as the emails we have plenty that is tangible... just nothing the politicians at that time wanted to pursue.

if it had been Trump, they would have impeached him for destroying emails or "covering it up" and blatant security breeches b using a non secured server.
 
Dayton3 said:
I never said that.
Click to expand...

Sure you did, you said:

Dayton3 said:
I knew the Clintons for more than a decade before Bill Clinton took office. This statement by Hillary Clinton is more than credible.
Click to expand...

You knew them so well you know all about their corruption and we should just believe you! Why wouldn't I take the word of a stranger on the internet telling me something outrageous?

Hypothetical said:
no i believe what i hear in the actual proceedings, thanks. and as far as the emails we have plenty that is tangible... just nothing the politicians at that time wanted to pursue.

if it had been Trump, they would have impeached him for destroying emails or "covering it up" and blatant security breeches b using a non secured server.
Click to expand...

Aha, so there's totally "tons of corrupt and illegal stuff" the Clintons did, but the Republican party that tried to attack them for 3 decades simply doesn't want to prosecute them. :lamo That's probably the dumbest thing I've heard on this forum all month. If there were anything at all the Republicans could get the Clintons on, they would've tried. So far, nothing.
 
Let me guess, someone got one of those chain Emails.
 
Hypothetical said:
NOT so sure about that. I think there are powers Vying for control... remember it has been proven that FBI members DID in fact illegally surveil the Trump campaign due to political bias. We just aren't sure just how deep that bias went.... yet.
Click to expand...

Proven it was illegal? Hmmm, got a reliable link on that?
 
marke said:
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
Click to expand...

Politifact
No, Clinton did not write email stating ‘we’re all going to hang from nooses’ if Trump wins

The Facebook post was published Dec. 28 in a pro-Donald Trump group. It was flagged as part of the company’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.

Snopes
Did Hillary Clinton Say That If Trump Won, ‘We’re All Going to Hang from Nooses’?
The supposed quote eventually became immortalized in meme form and then REALLY took off.
False

Factcheck.org
No Evidence Clinton Sent ‘Nooses’ Email to Brazile​

But you did help propagate another lie on the internet. Go collect your paycheck.
 
jnug said:
Hmmmmmm......the record says otherwise though without doubt the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. Most of those guys died off or.........became Republicans!
Click to expand...

Another fake claim about how all the bad Democrats became Republicans. When did that happen?
 
Condor060 said:
Another fake claim about how all the bad Democrats became Republicans. When did that happen?
Click to expand...

My post:
Hmmmmmm......the record says otherwise though without doubt the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. Most of those guys died off or.........became Republicans!

I said "most". You still seem to have difficulty reading. Check the record. The record for corruption from Nixon forward is decidedly in favor of the GOP being fabulously corrupt and its not even close.
 
jnug said:
My post:
Hmmmmmm......the record says otherwise though without doubt the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. Most of those guys died off or.........became Republicans!

I said "most". You still seem to have difficulty reading. Check the record. The record for corruption from Nixon forward is decidedly in favor of the GOP being fabulously corrupt and its not even close.
Click to expand...

Oh, You are claiming the Southern strategy myth had all these racist Democrats switch to the Republican party so now the Republican party is racist and the Democrats are the good guys?

I knew you would by that BS.
 
Condor060 said:
Oh, You are claiming the Southern strategy myth had all these racist Democrats switch to the Republican party so now the Republican party is racist and the Democrats are the good guys?

I knew you would by that BS.
Click to expand...

From my post:
"I said "most". You still seem to have difficulty reading. Check the record. The record for corruption from Nixon forward is decidedly in favor of the GOP being fabulously corrupt and its not even close."

the topic is corruption. It is undeniable that the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. It is equally undeniable that the Republican Party has a far worse record of corruption in Federal Government from Nixon forward to today and that Trump and his cronies continue that trend.
 
jnug said:
From my post:
"I said "most". You still seem to have difficulty reading. Check the record. The record for corruption from Nixon forward is decidedly in favor of the GOP being fabulously corrupt and its not even close."

the topic is corruption. It is undeniable that the Dem Party had a worse record for corruption up through the early 20th Century. It is equally undeniable that the Republican Party has a far worse record of corruption in Federal Government from Nixon forward to today and that Trump and his cronies continue that trend.
Click to expand...

Just for the record, there was no migration of these Dixiecrats to the Republican party. Storm Thurman was the ONLY Democrat that switched parties. So your theory of migrating Democrats is a myth. If it wasn't you would be able to find the names of these migrating Democrats. But you can't.

If you remember correctly, as soon as the tapes were released, EVERYONE abandoned Nixon. Voters and his political supporters all walked away from him which is why he decided to resign.
 
Lovebug said:
Let me guess, someone got one of those chain Emails.
Click to expand...

Yes, I got one from a Nigerian prince. Should I send him the $500 he wants in order to release the $4 million I'm owed? Seems entirely plausible to me-about as plausible as Trump being an honest individual.
 
Condor060 said:
Another fake claim about how all the bad Democrats became Republicans. When did that happen?
Click to expand...

Ask Trump; he's flip-flopped political affiliation so many times (at least five), that it's hard to know what he supports at any given time.
 
Last edited:
marke said:
A whistleblower close to Hillary during her campaign prior to the 2016 election provided this eyewitness quote from Hillary to her DNC staff after a bad interview with Matt Lauer:

"If that fu**ing basta** wins, we're all going to hang from nooses. You better fix this sh**!"

What is she talking about? Democrat corruption in DC which nearly all high level democrat politicians know about and are involved with, but which lowly democrats like her staff workers were probably mostly unaware of. Sure the democrats wanted her to win, but it scared them to death contemplating the possibility that Trump would win and bust up their crime and protection racket under which they had criminally operated for years with practically no danger of exposure.

INS officials under Obama feared a Trump presidency? Of course. They had willingly participated in illegal spy operations on the Trump campaign. They were desperate to come up with an insurance policy by which to bring him down if he won, to keep any investigators from entering in who were not on the democrat payroll, so to speak. Democrats are not just seeking vengeance on Trump for winning, but they desperately need to destroy him to shut down ongoing investigations into democrat corruption which continue to threaten them all the danger of "hanging from nooses" if investigations into democrat corruption are not shut down.
Click to expand...

Why is this nonsense not in CT?
 
snakestretcher said:
Ask Trump; he's flip-flopped political affiliation so many times it's hard to know what he likes at any given time.
Click to expand...

So Trump represents all the bad Democrats that flipped in the 60's. Well thats one. Is that all you got.
 
calamity said:
Why is this nonsense not in CT?
Click to expand...

Because he believes it's the truth, and nothing can persuade a conspiracy theorist otherwise. Everything to them has an agenda, a sub-plot, a 'deep-state' or Communist link. It's their bread and butter. Sad.
 
It's becoming increasingly obvious that there isn't a single "Very Conservative" poster on this forum worth paying any attention to. It's all lies, conspiratorial nonsense, and trolling.
 
Condor060 said:
So Trump represents all the bad Democrats that flipped in the 60's. Well thats one. Is that all you got.
Click to expand...

The only things Trump represents are ignorance, incompetence and a total lack of decency. You don't need a political affiliation for that. To Trump it comes naturally.
 
marke said:
Here is a simple test. Did investigators intend to prosecute Nixon for destroying evidence related to Watergate? Yes. Did prosecutors intend to prosecute Hillary for destroying evidence related to Benghazi and foreign money laundering? No. Why not? Because Hillary was more important than Nixon? I don't think so. Because Hillary was a dirty blond woman and Nixon was a dirty-bearded white guy? No, that was not it either. Because Hillary was a democrat and Nixon was a republican? BINGO!
Click to expand...

What evidence did Nixon destroy?

The only thing I remember missing was about 15 minutes of tape for which Nixon wasn't blamed.
 
marke said:
For whatever reason there are some people who simply will not believe the thousands of behind the scenes reports which expose Hillary for the very bad person she is. Even when Wikileaks exposed her own emails her supporters saw nothing but purity on her part and evil on the part of anyone who would dare do such a thing as expose the truth for what it is.
Click to expand...

Truth be told, Wikileaks didn't really expose much.
 
Condor060 said:
Another fake claim about how all the bad Democrats became Republicans. When did that happen?
Click to expand...

Nixon’s “southern strategy.” Read up on it.
 
less right said:
What evidence did Nixon destroy?

The only thing I remember missing was about 15 minutes of tape for which Nixon wasn't blamed.
Click to expand...

No, his secretary was blamed for it - for "accidentally" doing this: hitting the erase pedal while answering the phone.

watergate-f3b6753392560a3c0f5ddd33fc6b753eca799fbb-s800-c85.jpg

Haven't we all done that at some time of another? ;)
 
Excast said:
It's becoming increasingly obvious that there isn't a single "Very Conservative" poster on this forum worth paying any attention to. It's all lies, conspiratorial nonsense, and trolling.
Click to expand...

Why is it not possible to disagree with someone without being disagreeable? We may not agree with "Very Conservative" viewpoints but that does not mean those that hold them are lying.

Why can't posters here live up the site's banner regarding civility. Would make using this site more enjoyable for all IMHO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom